Lets put a face to the names

by **darnokpl** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:13 pm

dageir wrote:Yeah, lets hope its that cool in 70 years.

In ~1600 only slaves had tattoos strange that free people wants them in our times

No offence intended.

by **colesie** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:17 pm

No need for you two to chop the guy down. I haven't seen a picture of either of you yet so either post one or keep it to yourself please. He had the courage to post so let him have his tattoos

by **dageir** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:21 pm

Sorry. Im just jealous. The tattoo is very cool.

by **Ornery** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:31 pm

It's really well done, too. You had a good tattoo artist.

by **darnokpl** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:45 pm

colesie wrote:No need for you two to chop the guy down. I haven't seen a picture of either of you yet so either post one or keep it to yourself please. He had the courage to post so let him have his tattoos

Just saying historical fact

As for photos, some people care about their privacy more than others and as I said my post shouldn't be taken as offence.
If someone likes tattoos it will make impression on him, if someone doesn't he still got right to say it, no matter he posted his photo or not.

by **Boss** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:31 pm

Well age old saying, To each their own. I guess

Glad some of you like my back piece. Was done by my mentor & friend, Shoko Sonoda of Sumiya.
Endured too many hours not to show it off any chance i get x) sorry!

by **MagicManICT** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:32 am

darnokpl wrote:
colesie wrote:No need for you two to chop the guy down. I haven't seen a picture of either of you yet so either post one or keep it to yourself please. He had the courage to post so let him have his tattoos

Just saying historical fact
As for photos, some people care about their privacy more than others and as I said my post shouldn't be taken as offence.
If someone likes tattoos it will make impression on him, if someone doesn't he still got right to say it, no matter he posted his photo or not.

This may be a historical fact, but it's only a fraction of the history of tattoos. If people would like to discuss the history of tattoos, I'll be glad to split the discussion out, otherwise let's keep it to the subject at hand.

by **Dallane** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:58 am

MagicManICT wrote:
darnokpl wrote:
colesie wrote:No need for you two to chop the guy down. I haven't seen a picture of either of you yet so either post one or keep it to yourself please. He had the courage to post so let him have his tattoos

Just saying historical fact
As for photos, some people care about their privacy more than others and as I said my post shouldn't be taken as offence.
If someone likes tattoos it will make impression on him, if someone doesn't he still got right to say it, no matter he posted his photo or not.

This may be a historical fact, but it's only a fraction of the history of tattoos. If people would like to discuss the history of tattoos, I'll be glad to split the discussion out, otherwise let's keep it to the subject at hand.

plz do i would like to delve deeper into darnokpl's misunderstood world

by **dageir** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:45 am

Why are some people picking on darnokpl? Is it just teasing? Seems like a normal chap. Sorry about further derail.

by **alloin** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:34 pm

Oh hell why not, if you google my forumname, you find loads of pics of me...

This is me (about 8 years ago)! Ready to kill everyone !!

Same pic with some paint-effects

Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Re: Lets put a face to the names

Who is online