darnokpl wrote:colesie wrote:darnokpl wrote:Maybe it will be gone soon?
No...
Can you explain why?
Official statement on custom clients / mods
And that's all the explanation as has been "officially" given on the subject (and likely to get).
darnokpl wrote:colesie wrote:darnokpl wrote:Maybe it will be gone soon?
No...
Can you explain why?
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
L33LEE wrote:The EULA you are referring to is basically the paradox EULA, It will be upto them if they choose to force seatribe to enforce this rule.
Until a statement from paradox is made over-ruling seatribes stance on mods / bots, then use of them is allowed(From what i understand), then if seatribe refuse such changes i guess funding, sponsor or w/e etc can be pulled.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
L33LEE wrote:The EULA you are referring to is basically the paradox EULA, It will be upto them if they choose to force seatribe to enforce this rule.
Sevenless wrote:I have a longstanding gripe about this issue. And the legal butt coverage, while expected, does not make me happier about the situation.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Dallane wrote:Really its not going to stop anything. People just won't talk about it anymore
Dallane wrote:darnokpl wrote:
Can you explain why?
Do you not know anything about the devs?
L33LEE wrote:Dallane wrote:Really its not going to stop anything. People just won't talk about it anymore
I am sure measures can be implemented to detect people who use modded clients and swiftly ban then accordingly, IF they took that stance against it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest