by Mushibag » Mon Dec 17, 2012 6:12 pm
jwhitehorn wrote:the Hackers of Gallows who covet their unfair advantages.
by colesie » Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:27 pm
G1real wrote:
by Droj » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:07 pm
loftar wrote:I not like, you not get
by Ornery » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:15 pm
by jwhitehorn » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:55 pm
Mushibag wrote:Get your facts straight, sir. We sent our mods to Ender to incorporate into his client, and he opted to not put in the 1x1 farm tiles, but you can thank us for the transparent chat window and saving window locations.
by staxjax » Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:02 pm
by Vigilance » Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:41 pm
TotalyMoo wrote:I feel bad for the person who robbed you. If you're going to attack one of the most liked users in the game at least make sure your base is more than 2 minutes away.
Suffragium wrote:I love sausages.
by EnderWiggin » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:03 am
What is interesting, currently my client on github was forked by 7 people. Of those only 2 sent me any pull requests, or pushed anything into their repos. 1 pull request I declined, it contained built-in map session merger - nice thing, but will fail miserably in some cases, possibly corrupting map folder. Also I've got 2 pulls from Trojanz - 1 about chat transparency and small color tweaks - I've accepted it. And other about window positions saving - I've rejected it and implemented my own solution. And only word description of 1x1 field mod - I perfectly can replicate it, I just do not want this ****. Haven's beauty already ruined by many client tweaks, I don't want to do this to Salem, unless I must. And even those tweaks were given to me only after I've heard about some 'cool secretz client' and asked about it. So much of being open, yes? So there is 5 more forks of my client plus 1 fork of APXEOLOG's, not counting anyone who just get sources without forking on github and no info about those clients.staxjax wrote:You should ask the russians to upload their client instead, I'm sure it has a lot more cool **** than ours does.
by EnderWiggin » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:04 am
Hm... i don't even...Vigilance wrote:Unless you raid him before summoning is implemented...
Wonder who did that.
by jwhitehorn » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:16 am
EnderWiggin wrote:What is interesting, currently my client on github was forked by 7 people. Of those only 2 sent me any pull requests, or pushed anything into their repos. 1 pull request I declined, it contained built-in map session merger - nice thing, but will fail miserably in some cases, possibly corrupting map folder. Also I've got 2 pulls from Trojanz - 1 about chat transparency and small color tweaks - I've accepted it. And other about window positions saving - I've rejected it and implemented my own solution. And only word description of 1x1 field mod - I perfectly can replicate it, I just do not want this ****. Haven's beauty already ruined by many client tweaks, I don't want to do this to Salem, unless I must. And even those tweaks were given to me only after I've heard about some 'cool secretz client' and asked about it. So much of being open, yes? So there is 5 more forks of my client plus 1 fork of APXEOLOG's, not counting anyone who just get sources without forking on github and no info about those clients.
And all this is really upsetting me. I am all for custom clients - the more of them exist - the better. But they must be available to everyone. Hell, I have even started thinking about how modular custom client could be implemented. So everyone could choose what parts of which client he wants. But what point in doing this if most clients are secret?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
