MaxPlanck wrote:The aggressor risks nothing.
The aggressor walked a character with waste to the location of their enemies base. Which is more than the defender risked staying huddled behind their walls.
MaxPlanck wrote:The aggressor risks nothing.
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:The aggressor risked going out into the open, building the TBF in the first place, and the mats, however small or great to build it.
Taipion wrote:
It looks like that the "attacker" has no risk at all,
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:Taipion wrote:
It looks like that the "attacker" has no risk at all,
Then you are blind. The attacker risked bringing a character with waste across the map with a handful of materials to inflict strife on his foes. The amount of risk can be debated. The absence of risk though would be and out and out lie.
Heffernan wrote:JohnCarver wrote:Taipion wrote:
It looks like that the "attacker" has no risk at all,
Then you are blind. The attacker risked bringing a character with waste across the map with a handful of materials to inflict strife on his foes. The amount of risk can be debated. The absence of risk though would be and out and out lie.
in the post i made up yours i pointed out why there is not a single risk
Waste is this
a few coin collections, tentacles or thornbush flowers and a whispering log and ur set. less risk then getting the reward of having someone unable to port for 24h+.
Heffernan wrote:
yup, idc i can remove it in 20h, the point is they shouldnt be spammable unless you are manly enough to actually raid something.
((this is in NO way a QQ just a general idea to increase its cost wich should have been done long ago))
Riolic wrote:The only reason raids still happen is because Goodman is a stubborn *******.
The rest are just vets pk'ing newbs
Goodman12 wrote:Its quite amusing that you of all people would complain about this
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests