Chrumps wrote:Claeyt wrote:If you think Breivik was correct then you need to take a long hard look at your views.
I nowhere said so. I only said it's your post that makes these ideas looking reasonable.
All racists and nationalists seem reasonable at first.
I highly recommend you watch this short movie (17 min) about Fascism from 1947. It talks about how fascism may seem reasonable at first.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23X14HS4gLk#t=01m05s
It's a really, really interesting watch
Chrumps wrote:Claeyt wrote:[utter nonsense]
You made me check the cross on the church in my town. Thankfully it is still regular Roman Cross.
https://www.google.pl/maps/@50.0617949, ... 728!8i4864
Actually the cross on your church is a halo'd Catholic processional cross. I'm guessing it's a Cathedral and is a seat of a Bishop. The Halo'd processional Cross represents that a Bishop sits at the head of diocese there, thus it is a Cathedral and not a monastery, nunnery or other holy site. You can tell it's not the seat of an Archbishop (Archdiocese) or Cardinal by it's lack of symbols representing those seats within the Catholic Church.
Chrumps wrote:Claeyt wrote:If you somehow believe my ideas of "Democratic Socialism" are the same as Breivik's then you are really, really wrong.
Sorry snowflake to break your delusions. We have tested "democratic socialism" here. It didn't work as you claim it will. It was an oppressive regime. I live long enough to have witnessed how it worked.
'Social Democracy' and/or 'Democratic Socialism' aren't represented by the Soviet Union. All Western Countries are partly Social Democracies now. Think Sweden or France as being Social Democracies with the U.S. as being a lesser representative of Social Democracy. Democratic Socialism is slightly different in that it holds the belief that some things should be owned socially. This could mean that the state should own power plants, airports, hospitals, highways or other basic infrastructure like in the U.S. There's a mix of municipal ownership of stuff like this here. It could also mean that the state should own some means of production such as in other countries. All of this is driven by democratic rather than revolutionary change in a Social Democracy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_democracy