THESE ARE WHAT HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED SO FAR FROM THE TRUMP PISS DOSSIER
Fact 1 confirmed from the dossier: Trump campaign staff had contact with Russian Intelligence during the campaign.
The Estonian national newspaper 'The Postimes' is reporting that the Estonian intelligence service has video and tape of a Trump "associate" meeting with a member of the Russian Duma who was acting on behalf of Putin and Russian Intelligence DURING the campaign. It was reported that a Baltic intelligence agency had something this week by Newsweek and Mother Jones it is now confirmed to be Estonia.
The meeting apparently occurred to tell the campaign that Russia was ending the wikileaks operation because it was afraid it had been revealed. The Russian head of the FSB who had told Putin that it wouldn't lead back to Russia had just been released by Putin because of the failure.
http://news.postimees.ee/3976043/estoni ... 1484431403Fact 2 confirmed from the dossier: The Trump campaign had monetary help from the Russians
The BBC (not fake news in any way) is reporting that Western intelligence agencies have a tape of a Russian Intelligence officer talking about money flowing to the Trump campaign and/or it's employees. This was the basis for the opening of the previously mentioned U.S. counterintelligence Task Force which is ongoing.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38589427Fact 3 confirmed from the dossier: Paul Manafort has had contact with Viktor Yanukovych since Euromaiden
Paul Manafort has had continuing contact up until 2015 with his former Pro-Ukrainian employer. This has been well documented and it is unknown if he had contact with them in 2016 but he has been under an FBI investigation since the Ukrainians found documentation that he had been payed (and not reported it to U.S. officials) by both pro-Russian Ukrainian leadership and Russian Intelligence interests BEFORE the Euromaiden revolution in Ukraine.
_________________________________________________________________________________
TotalyMeow wrote:The Independent was bought by Alexander Lebedev in 2010. That aside, I'm also seeing the former MI6 agent they seem to have gotten a lot of their info from was working for an opponent of Trump and then the Democratic Party. It's a tad suspicious.
His consulting firm was working for opo research but this is different. First off, this MI6 agent was the head of operations for years in Russia and then their top analyst in London. It's being reported that he was so disturbed with what he found that after the election in November, he continued to work on it.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38589427TotalyMeow wrote:Yes, it says he called the ambassador on Dec 19 to express condolences regarding the assassination of the Russian ambassador to Turkey, on Dec 25 to wish him Merry Christmas, and on Dec 28 to express condolences over a Russian plane crash and to set up a call between Trump and Putin after the inauguration. That sounds to me like the guy's trying to do his job.
The incoming NSA director is NOT supposed to have any contact with the Russians that is not coordinated with the current White House. Also they're also reporting that he had 5 phone calls with the Russian embassy on the same day before the sanctions were announced. Trump's guys were informed about the incoming sanctions 3 days before they were announced. Flynn is in violation of the Logan act at the least.
TotalyMeow wrote:Rachel Maddow can't really be trusted in anything and all she's got here is that there was a closed-door meeting that the participants weren't supposed to talk about, but said participants chose to mention that they really hate FBI direct Comey when asked about the meeting. Now, whether Comey had anything to do with the meeting, we know not. "I can't say anything, but I sure hate Comey, draw your own conclusions", isn't the sort of statement I want to draw conclusions about.
The participants or congress and the senators were required to sign a federal confidentiality agreement before the briefing. Comey the head of the FBI, along with the heads of CIA, Treasury department, the NSA and the National security coordinator were all there. They apparently were briefing about the counterintelligence task force that had been formed in September. The task force applied for FISA warrants in October, before the election and it is ongoing.
I posted this info above but maybe you missed it.
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ru ... cia-2017-1TotalyMeow wrote:The Daily Mail is a satirical paper that sometimes prints the truth, and sometimes just goes for shock value and readership. This particular article mentions no names, just says 'American officials' have told Israel not to share any intelligence with Trump once he is in office. Now, keeping in mind all the horrible things Obama has been doing as fast as he can to screw Trump over as much as possible before he leaves, it wouldn't surprise me if he had had someone say this to Israel, but it's more a reflection on Obama than it is on Trump.
What the hell are you talking about? First off 'The Daily Mail' is a conservative rag, not a liberal one and yes it sometimes adds to the drama for shock but rarely against Trump. Second, nobody but Trump supporters are spewing nonsense about Obama during transition. Just because he doesn't block a UN condemnation with no teeth against Israeli settlements and just because he ends free citizenship for Cubans he's screwing Trump. I think Trump's screwing himself and making himself look like an idiot without any help from anyone else and his polls show it. This dossier is a thing and it is under investigation. I don't know if it'll go farther than Trump looking like he was used by the Russian like a hanky but it is something. Also Flynn's and Manafort's contacts with Russian intelligence and the ex-pro Russian Ukrainian leader now living in Moscow are already well known.
TotalyMeow wrote:I'd like to ask the Trump fans out there what exactly is to much for you to keep supporting him?
As for this question, it really highlights the liberal penchant for putting people into categories, that anyone who voted for Trump must be a Trump fan who will support him unceasingly in everything. I have hopes he'll do okay as president, but he's already done a few things I find a bit iffy and a few things I don't like, like they way he dealt with Carrier. That was a far too socialist type move and it just goes to show that Trump has some pretty liberal leanings; he was a Democrat until a few years ago. I intend to give him a fair chance, he isn't even president yet so there's no information to use to judge how well he is doing as president and whether or not I will be voting for him next election (which is what I assume you mean by 'support'); almost all of what has been reported about him by the media has been overexaggerated, has used language meant to mislead and inflame, and has been overall just ridiculous to the point where I seriously have a hard time believing any of it at all anymore. Which is very upsetting because I would like to be able to make informed decisions about current events and I feel like I'm not being informed.
Now, Trump's tweets are mostly idiotic and someone should change his damn account password, but no matter what he said I really don't think it's a good thing for it to be implied that such powerful government agencies as the ones that make up the intelligence community might try to undermine our actual president.
This is something to be upset about.
Trump is doing all of this himself in my opinion. The media is just highlighting his idiocy now.
I believe that he'll be impeached within a year if this keeps going the way it has, at the very least there will be years of hearings about Russian hacking and Russian contacts with the campaign. 3 committees (Including the Senate intelligence committee) have already signed up for hearings and he hasn't even taken office yet.
I think that you're going to be embarrassed that you voted for him and I still have to ask, what exactly would he have to do Tmeow for you to stop defending his actions and tweets? Tell me when we reach it, okay?
Dallane wrote:Lazun123 wrote:So, let me ask you this clay. Why are you defending a corrupt politician and her party
Because he is a commie satanist who only wants to destroy america.
Why are you guys calling me clay? Is this some sort of Salem clay troll joke? Learn to spell.
As for Clinton. Her actions are now proven over and over to be legal if bad for open government. 9 Benghazi committee's in a Republican house found nothing and blamed Panetta in the end for lax security and loose contact with Italy.