Nsuidara wrote:Lansett wrote:Nsuidara wrote:statistic is more than summarizing... prameters... mean
No it's not.Nsuidara wrote:"This is basic statistics."
You showed you understand the basics in the first part of your post so why do you digress with bad math in the second half ?Nsuidara wrote:10th toss have still 50% chance
We don't care about 10th toss chances.
We care about the chance to fail 22 times. Which is 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 ... 22 times, and is ridiculously low.
yes if you so ideally toss
but isnt ideally... random in computer method isnt ideally... so is possible 100% have chance for fail
but other say is work. so meybe end it and is solved ?
Maybe they didn't eat the candies from a feasting table?
One other person mentioned that he also had problems with the lollies (12 uses, no gain). I know i am losing you here, but that again only would happen ~0.025% of the time.
That, at least to me, indicates that there may be a bug.