Stalls

Forum for suggesting changes to Salem.

Re: Stalls

Postby Judaism » Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:19 pm

Sinnerman wrote:my stall


You are clearly wrong, no-1 owns a stall. Its all property of Providence, everyone pays rent for it. I would like the opposite of your idea, people do rent the stalls and should not be able to ''trade'' their stalls for silver in the first case.
JohnCarver wrote:Mortal Moments Inc. is not here to cannibalize the community or piece out the code. We are not here because we wish to institute pay to win models or PvE servers. Quite the contrary.
User avatar
Judaism
Customer
 
Posts: 3989
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:51 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Stalls

Postby Gromar » Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:15 pm

pistolshrimp wrote:I don't see any reason why any person who owns a stall shouldn't be forced to maintain it themselves.

If you want a town to own a stall buy a stall with a community account.

Well. So you suggest to do something illegal to avoid the implementation of a useful function which would help players who can not be online 24/7? Some people do have friends and can share the duty of filling a store and keeping it running.

well - I assume the Stall topic is not in its final design yet anyway. So let us see what else is going to come.
Gromar
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 9:45 pm

Re: Stalls

Postby Kush » Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:32 pm

If you can't handle a stall by yourself, don't rent one. Problem solved
Kush
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:29 pm

Re: Stalls

Postby Procne » Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:42 pm

Gromar wrote:
pistolshrimp wrote:I don't see any reason why any person who owns a stall shouldn't be forced to maintain it themselves.

If you want a town to own a stall buy a stall with a community account.

Well. So you suggest to do something illegal to avoid the implementation of a useful function which would help players who can not be online 24/7? Some people do have friends and can share the duty of filling a store and keeping it running.

well - I assume the Stall topic is not in its final design yet anyway. So let us see what else is going to come.


Actually... EULA only states that unauthorized third-party access is forbidden. If I authorize someone then it's not forbidden I guess. Of course, as chief has stated before, if anyone complains about the outcome of his account being shared then the account will be locked.
Image
Procne
 
Posts: 3696
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 pm

Re: Stalls

Postby trungdle » Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:43 pm

Go kill the stall owners and take it. Transfer Salem style.
You thought I quit.
User avatar
trungdle
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:20 pm
Location: Humble, Texas

Re: Stalls

Postby Kandarim » Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:19 pm

Gromar wrote:something illegal

it's a gray area. Action will only be taking following reports of abuse by your account sharers.

Gromar wrote:to avoid the implementation of a useful function which would help players who can not be online 24/7? Some people do have friends and can share the duty of filling a store and keeping it running.


Stalls in their current implementation are there exactly to cater towards people who can't be online 24/7.
What you are asking for is a way so that you can share a stall with people you don't trust and that don't trust you (community account or either of you owning the stall constantly not being an option, apparently).

Gromar wrote:well - I assume the Stall topic is not in its final design yet anyway. So let us see what else is going to come.


why wouldn't it be?
I have neither the crayons nor the time to explain it to you.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
User avatar
Kandarim
Customer
 
Posts: 5321
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:18 pm

Previous

Return to Ideas & Innovations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests