So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Forum for off topic and general discussion.

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Kaios » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:40 am

loftar wrote:The point being that, if you don't read his posts and therefore don't know why he is being trolled, how can you claim that these actions are unfair?


And my point being that it's a simple thing to click his Username and add him to the "foe list." I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby loftar » Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:14 am

Kaios wrote:And my point being that it's a simple thing to click his Username and add him to the "foe list."

Do you really consider it more courteous to completely ignore someone? I would argue the foe list is more for spammers.
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 7:32 am
Location: In your character database, shuffling bits

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Kaios » Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:19 am

loftar wrote:Do you really consider it more courteous to completely ignore someone? I would argue the foe list is more for spammers.


You do realize you're not the only person with some sort of resentment towards him, right? What I'm saying easily applies to everyone else who also dislikes his posts for whatever reasons and I don't think every one of the people on that list are all holding the same "arguments" with him and receiving some sort of pleasure out of it. It would seem to me some people just find him genuinely annoying, something which could be easily remedied through my earlier suggestion.

In any case, while you may be enjoying this in some manner I for one am not as I continue to make no reasonable steps towards a resolution of my grievances. Also you're pretty lame for berating someone when they aren't even here to defend themselves.

loftar wrote:I have frequently questioned myself with regards to my interactions with Claeyt, whether it's really okay for me to bully the retarded kid on the block.
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby loftar » Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:35 am

Kaios wrote:In any case, while you may be enjoying this in some manner I for one am not as I continue to make no reasonable steps towards a resolution of my grievances.

Well, if the resolution you seek is the removal of the hat from Claeyt, then you should have seen from the beginning that it was pointless to argue with me, as it is John and not me who is now the owner of Salem.

Kaios wrote:Also you're pretty lame for berating someone when they aren't even here to defend themselves.

Apart from the final reply I made to his post I don't think I have brought anything new to the table about Claeyt since he was banned. (And I also figure he'll have all the time in the world to respond when he gets back again.)

EDIT: Ah, if you refer to that "retarded kid on the block", then I apologize if you or Claeyt consider that an insult about him. That wasn't my intention; it was more of an assessment of what I asked myself if I was doing, so it was intended more as an insult to myself, if anything. If you have a better analogy, I'll be happy to learn it.
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 7:32 am
Location: In your character database, shuffling bits

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Darwoth » Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:06 am

the big question here is why kaios thinks anyone gives a ***** about whether he and his bob marley poster approve of people using claeyt as a (much deserved) punching bag.
Image
User avatar
Darwoth
 
Posts: 8035
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 5:11 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Icon » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:52 pm

I just want to know how this got to 64 ***** pages
Image
User avatar
Icon
 
Posts: 1722
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 8:29 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Orcling » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:54 pm

Icon wrote:I just want to know how this got to 64 ***** pages

Because the world revolves around Darwoths racism.
Also because Claeyt and Kaios make up 50 of those pages.
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Dallane » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:54 pm

Icon wrote:I just want to know how this got to 64 ***** pages


It became a central location for cryeat to have a soap box.
Please click this link for a better salem forum experience

TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
User avatar
Dallane
Moderator
 
Posts: 15195
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Cheena » Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:13 pm

Bah. If Biddas can have his own topic, I guess Claeyt can too :|
Trust your enemies more than your friends. Your enemies will never betray you.
loftar wrote:***** the treaty.

(Note: Citation is severely out of context.)
User avatar
Cheena
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:46 am
Location: Providence

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Orcling » Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:42 pm

Cheena wrote:Bah. If Biddas can have his own topic, I guess Claeyt can too :|

But this is Darwoths topic, see, it even has Darwoth in the name.
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

PreviousNext

Return to City upon a Hill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests