Siege of Celestis

Forum for In-Game politics, relations, matters of justice, and other in-game topics.

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby Darwoth » Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:29 pm

what towns? :lol:

edit: ok i get it, your own towns. funny one =P :lol: :lol:
Last edited by Darwoth on Mon Jun 30, 2014 9:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
Darwoth
 
Posts: 8035
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 5:11 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby Orcling » Mon Jun 30, 2014 6:18 pm

Trenial wrote:Go home DarkNachT, you're drunk again.


Are you projecting?
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby jesi » Mon Jun 30, 2014 6:26 pm

Darwoth wrote:so basically niceguy broke some stumps and got his entire town destroyed for the half dozenth time while the rest of you sat around also doing nothing but blaming it all on darchnacht :lol:


No that is not really it. (and, hey, Darwoth - how y'a doing? - from one grandparent to another). Basically what Cheena said is correct, though the bit about us being cowards is a hard pill to swallow. I, like a few other town members, was unable to participate in the defense this weekends. I know that sounds like a lame defense but Celestis is and was, other than Dark and Emil, mainly formed with casual players.

I was, however, flattered to be the first featured destroyed farmstead and I hope the dry boards and green cabbage helped to compensate you for your time. Thanks for not cutting my trees although I was a bit sorry PmP did not spot the homage to the original treaty terms, in the form of the two birch trees on either side of the inner gate. (At least my record remains intact in that I have never chopped down a tree that I did not plant myself. Chief would be proud.)

Anyway, Jesi is safe and will continue in one way or another. No need for a ragequit on my end.
aptson wrote:
when i make posts on the forums i expect people to spell it out for me because i am new . .
jesi
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:48 am

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby TruthTeller » Mon Jun 30, 2014 6:56 pm

She is a 100% peacefull and neutral player, never attacked anyone or even talked bad about anyone, let alone about Tribe.


You can't play the client game and be neutral. You either for or against the tribe. Per definition anyone who doesn't sign the treaty or similar, are against the tribe. By signing/allying with the tribe you are on the side of the tribe.

The only way to be neutral is to not play the client game.
Forum game is enough :lol:
TruthTeller
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:06 am

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby jesi » Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:00 pm

TruthTeller wrote:
She is a 100% peacefull and neutral player, never attacked anyone or even talked bad about anyone, let alone about Tribe.


You can't play the client game and be neutral. You either for or against the tribe. Per definition anyone who doesn't sign the treaty or similar, are against the tribe. By signing/allying with the tribe you are on the side of the tribe.

The only way to be neutral is to not play the client game.
Forum game is enough :lol:


Okay. . . But you really don't know what you are talking about.
Kind'a sad that post. Maybe you should try again. And, yes. I know who you are/
aptson wrote:
when i make posts on the forums i expect people to spell it out for me because i am new . .
jesi
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:48 am

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby TruthTeller » Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:03 pm

jesi wrote:
TruthTeller wrote:
She is a 100% peacefull and neutral player, never attacked anyone or even talked bad about anyone, let alone about Tribe.


You can't play the client game and be neutral. You either for or against the tribe. Per definition anyone who doesn't sign the treaty or similar, are against the tribe. By signing/allying with the tribe you are on the side of the tribe.

The only way to be neutral is to not play the client game.
Forum game is enough :lol:


Okay. . . But you really don't know what you are talking about.
Kind'a sad that post. Maybe you should try again. And, yes. I know who you are/


It is not like it is a secret who I am. :lol: Which is specially funny since I am noone of relevance in the current ingame politics :D.
TruthTeller
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:06 am

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby Feone » Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:06 pm

TruthTeller wrote:
She is a 100% peacefull and neutral player, never attacked anyone or even talked bad about anyone, let alone about Tribe.


You can't play the client game and be neutral. You either for or against the tribe. Per definition anyone who doesn't sign the treaty or similar, are against the tribe. By signing/allying with the tribe you are on the side of the tribe.

The only way to be neutral is to not play the client game.
Forum game is enough :lol:



Ofcourse you can be neutral.

If you're far from any major faction, have proper defenses and don't get involved with politics nobody will bother raiding you.
Not worth the trouble, essentially.
Feone
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 8:38 pm

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby Mereni » Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:17 pm

You can be neutral, if you don't want to declare for any major group. But unless you yourself are setting up a major group that can defend itself, you really can't be neutral forever. You either have to side with a major group so they can defend you or help you defend yourself, or you will be raided and destroyed.
User avatar
Mereni
 
Posts: 1839
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:26 am

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby RuneNL » Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:20 pm

Mereni wrote:You can be neutral, if you don't want to declare for any major group. But unless you yourself are setting up a major group that can defend itself, you really can't be neutral forever. You either have to side with a major group so they can defend you or help you defend yourself, or you will be raided and destroyed.


Because you can't be neutral as a group. Because as a group you pose a potential threat.
User avatar
RuneNL
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:28 am

Re: Siege of Celestis

Postby TruthTeller » Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:21 pm

Mereni wrote:You can be neutral, if you don't want to declare for any major group. But unless you yourself are setting up a major group that can defend itself, you really can't be neutral forever. You either have to side with a major group so they can defend you or help you defend yourself, or you will be raided and destroyed.


Why has the tribe changed their tune over the months I was gone from all four games? Back in the days, you did indeed demand people to sign treaty /ally with you or you would consider them to be hostile and thus not neutral.

Edit: To clarify, I consider neutrality to be multilateral property. If a faction declares war on you, you are not neutral anymore. To be neutral, a requirement (but not sufficient one) is that all parties have to be non-hostile against you.
TruthTeller
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:06 am

PreviousNext

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests