ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:You might not have been here for the beginning of this. Claeyt found the item in a barrel in town. He could have KO'd anybody and put it on them, or simply asked me in town what it did. Instead he chose to put an item that said "dunce" in the inventory onto his head. That it about as willing as a participant gets IMO.
Claeyt wrote:I understand that it's unequippable. I meant the crashing while using Kand's client. I understand that it's not bugged in the basic client but that forces me to only use the basic client or to switch back and forth on the clients. So although it's not bugged in the game it is bugged for only me when I try and play. Were you trying to force me to only use the basic client?
JohnCarver wrote:You using the default client or having items that only work on the default client is not intended. However, we also determined that the hat works just fine with Kandarim client on all of our tests. So it is highly possible that your kandarim is not working for some other reason and you are trying to blame it on the hat.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
neored9 wrote:Well that's the big issue here. It's not so clear there ever was an actual issue code-wise. A lot suggests he was lying to get his way.
imrielle wrote:Claeyt wrote:I understand that it's unequippable. I meant the crashing while using Kand's client. I understand that it's not bugged in the basic client but that forces me to only use the basic client or to switch back and forth on the clients. So although it's not bugged in the game it is bugged for only me when I try and play. Were you trying to force me to only use the basic client?
Claeyt, perhaps you should take a look at this thread: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=264
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't seen the new devs post anything that disagrees with this stance on custom clients. Therefore, you having a problem that only applies when you are using a custom client is... your issue. Not theirs.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
Claeyt wrote:JohnCarver wrote:You using the default client or having items that only work on the default client is not intended. However, we also determined that the hat works just fine with Kandarim client on all of our tests. So it is highly possible that your kandarim is not working for some other reason and you are trying to blame it on the hat.
The client works for all my other characters just fine. Tell me WTF I have to do to stop my game from crashing in Kand. Just stop trolling and tell me what to do. What specific example of my forum behavior are you pointing at over the last 2 weeks since you bought the game? Please post them here.
Claeyt wrote:What specific example of my forum behavior are you pointing at over the last 2 weeks since you bought the game? Please post them here.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
loftar wrote:neored9 wrote:Well that's the big issue here. It's not so clear there ever was an actual issue code-wise. A lot suggests he was lying to get his way.
To be sure, there is certainly nothing extraordinary about the hat that somehow makes it "reasonable" for a client to crash on it. If it is true that Kand's client can't handle it, then that's a bug in Kand's client, and he should debug it. I'm certainly willing to help him do so.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
JohnCarver wrote:You using the default client or having items that only work on the default client is not intended. However, we also determined that the hat works just fine with Kandarim client on all of our tests. So it is highly possible that your kandarim is not working for some other reason and you are trying to blame it on the hat.
Kaios wrote:Nah, just as you don't appreciate words being put in your mouth, neither does one appreciate you giving more meaning to their actions than there really was. A competent developer doesn't just drop a newly created item out for anyone to grab (Although it's clear who it was intended for) and not explain anything to anyone about it knowing fully well that it could cause any kind of issue.
Even if you don't feel the need to explain anything to someone when you make them a test subject, the least you could do if you can't solve the issue is remove the unwilling participant from the test as they ask and put an end to the argument once and for all, considering it's a supposed "test."
Instead there's an allowance for a continuous barrage of insults and a complete run-around making no progress towards any sort of reasonable resolution.
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests