So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Forum for off topic and general discussion.

Re: So why are the new dev's siding with Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Orcling » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:58 pm

TotalyMeow wrote:You can embed as many quotes as you want in a post, you just can't nest more than three deep in any single quote.

You need to Quote deeper.

Image
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Kaios » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:59 pm

Orcling wrote:
Kaios wrote:stop acting like this power hungry child and do the job you're supposed to do.

If I remember correctly, this game is Free, thus, you haven't actually paid for anything. The devs have no obligation whatsoever to you, they can, literally, do whatever the ***** they want. Its their Sandpit and if they wanna knock your sandcastle over, they have every right to do so. Sure you can be mad about it and refuse to eat your soup, but that's about it.


How can you be this deep inside the dev anus already?????????
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Vigilance » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:00 pm

Champie wrote:
joshnpk wrote:
Are you mad? how does not fixing Somebody else's software mean they are developing the game in such a game to not support custom clients?


I didn't say that. I asked if this was an example of the quality of work we can expect. The devs created a hat and gave it to one person. The hat has apparently made it difficult or impossible for that player to enjoy Salem using a widely adopted third party client. So far, the dev has suggested that the player in question can do his business on the default client. That's fine, but I would like to know if this behavior will continue or if it is something that the devs wish to avoid. It is a valid question.
I'm pretty sure the devs are taking exception to Claeyt's case because Claeyt is being a Claeyt. If this were any other human being that reacted normally, the issue would've been resolved. However: this still appears, from what I've gathered, to be an issue Kandarim needs to fix. Not JohnCarver.
Kaios wrote:How can you be this deep inside the dev anus already?????????

kaois wat has hapend 2 u???
Image
Suffragium wrote:I love sausages.
User avatar
Vigilance
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:40 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby joshnpk » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:00 pm

Champie wrote:
joshnpk wrote:
Are you mad? how does not fixing Somebody else's software mean they are developing the game in such a game to not support custom clients?


I didn't say that. I asked if this was an example of the quality of work we can expect. The devs created a hat and gave it to one person. The hat has apparently made it difficult or impossible for that player to enjoy Salem using a widely adopted third party client. So far, the dev has suggested that the player in question can do his business on the default client. That's fine, but I would like to know if this behavior will continue or if it is something that the devs wish to avoid. It is a valid question.


And hopefully the answer will be yes, for ***** wit's like you and claeyt.
I think I have a hat problem.
User avatar
joshnpk
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:53 am
Location: UK

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Orcling » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:01 pm

Kaios wrote:
Orcling wrote:
Kaios wrote:stop acting like this power hungry child and do the job you're supposed to do.

If I remember correctly, this game is Free, thus, you haven't actually paid for anything. The devs have no obligation whatsoever to you, they can, literally, do whatever the ***** they want. Its their Sandpit and if they wanna knock your sandcastle over, they have every right to do so. Sure you can be mad about it and refuse to eat your soup, but that's about it.


How can you be this deep inside the dev anus already?????????

I am kneedeep inside everyones Anus. THAT ALSO INCLUDES YOURS.


Edit: In case you haven't understood that, I'm on no ones side, I side with the devs just as much as I side against them. Though I will always pick the side that is against Claeyt.
Last edited by Orcling on Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

Re: So why are the new dev's siding with Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Champie » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:03 pm

TotalyMeow wrote:You can embed as many quotes as you want in a post, you just can't nest more than three deep in any single quote.


Thank you for clarifying that for me.
User avatar
Champie
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:24 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby neored9 » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:04 pm

Kaois and Creampie confirmed for claeyt bottom buddies
User avatar
neored9
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:28 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby RobertoKarlos » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:05 pm

neored9 wrote:Kaois and Creampie confirmed for claeyt bottom buddies

Confirmed.-
User avatar
RobertoKarlos
 
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:29 pm
Location: Mexico

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Claeyt » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:06 pm

joshnpk wrote:And hopefully the answer will be yes, for ***** wit's like you and claeyt.


Vigilance wrote:I'm pretty sure the devs are taking exception to Claeyt's case because Claeyt is being a Claeyt. If this were any other human being that reacted normally, the issue would've been resolved.


Why would any dev of any game punish players in-game for forum disagreements? They should be above the game and if they wanted to punish our forum behavior then they should simply clip our posts and ban our accounts for whatever amount of time they think is fair.
Last edited by Claeyt on Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child


As the river rolled over the cliffs, my own laughing joy was drowned out by the roaring deluge of the water. The great cataract of Darwoth's Tears fell over and over endlessly.
User avatar
Claeyt
 
Posts: 5166
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:02 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Orcling » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:08 pm

Claeyt wrote:
joshnpk wrote:And hopefully the answer will be yes, for ***** wit's like you and claeyt.

Why would any dev of any game punish players in-game for forum disagreements? They should be above the game and if they wanted to punish our forum behavior then they should simply clip our posts and ban our accounts for whatever amount of time they think is fair.

The forum and the game are deeply intertwined. One cannot exist without the other. As in, if you act like a **** on the forum, folks will murder your ass ingame.
If you murder someones ass ingame, people will be a **** to you on the forum.
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

PreviousNext

Return to City upon a Hill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests