TotalyMeow wrote:You can embed as many quotes as you want in a post, you just can't nest more than three deep in any single quote.
You need to Quote deeper.

TotalyMeow wrote:You can embed as many quotes as you want in a post, you just can't nest more than three deep in any single quote.
Orcling wrote:Kaios wrote:stop acting like this power hungry child and do the job you're supposed to do.
If I remember correctly, this game is Free, thus, you haven't actually paid for anything. The devs have no obligation whatsoever to you, they can, literally, do whatever the ***** they want. Its their Sandpit and if they wanna knock your sandcastle over, they have every right to do so. Sure you can be mad about it and refuse to eat your soup, but that's about it.
I'm pretty sure the devs are taking exception to Claeyt's case because Claeyt is being a Claeyt. If this were any other human being that reacted normally, the issue would've been resolved. However: this still appears, from what I've gathered, to be an issue Kandarim needs to fix. Not JohnCarver.Champie wrote:joshnpk wrote:
Are you mad? how does not fixing Somebody else's software mean they are developing the game in such a game to not support custom clients?
I didn't say that. I asked if this was an example of the quality of work we can expect. The devs created a hat and gave it to one person. The hat has apparently made it difficult or impossible for that player to enjoy Salem using a widely adopted third party client. So far, the dev has suggested that the player in question can do his business on the default client. That's fine, but I would like to know if this behavior will continue or if it is something that the devs wish to avoid. It is a valid question.
Kaios wrote:How can you be this deep inside the dev anus already?????????
Suffragium wrote:I love sausages.
Champie wrote:joshnpk wrote:
Are you mad? how does not fixing Somebody else's software mean they are developing the game in such a game to not support custom clients?
I didn't say that. I asked if this was an example of the quality of work we can expect. The devs created a hat and gave it to one person. The hat has apparently made it difficult or impossible for that player to enjoy Salem using a widely adopted third party client. So far, the dev has suggested that the player in question can do his business on the default client. That's fine, but I would like to know if this behavior will continue or if it is something that the devs wish to avoid. It is a valid question.
Kaios wrote:Orcling wrote:Kaios wrote:stop acting like this power hungry child and do the job you're supposed to do.
If I remember correctly, this game is Free, thus, you haven't actually paid for anything. The devs have no obligation whatsoever to you, they can, literally, do whatever the ***** they want. Its their Sandpit and if they wanna knock your sandcastle over, they have every right to do so. Sure you can be mad about it and refuse to eat your soup, but that's about it.
How can you be this deep inside the dev anus already?????????
TotalyMeow wrote:You can embed as many quotes as you want in a post, you just can't nest more than three deep in any single quote.
neored9 wrote:Kaois and Creampie confirmed for claeyt bottom buddies
joshnpk wrote:And hopefully the answer will be yes, for ***** wit's like you and claeyt.
Vigilance wrote:I'm pretty sure the devs are taking exception to Claeyt's case because Claeyt is being a Claeyt. If this were any other human being that reacted normally, the issue would've been resolved.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
Claeyt wrote:joshnpk wrote:And hopefully the answer will be yes, for ***** wit's like you and claeyt.
Why would any dev of any game punish players in-game for forum disagreements? They should be above the game and if they wanted to punish our forum behavior then they should simply clip our posts and ban our accounts for whatever amount of time they think is fair.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests