neored9 wrote:I just wanted to mention that I've talked to TotalyMeow about my ban and we agreed that while my posts weren't against the rules they were toxic to the forum. As a result the rules have been expanded and she apologized for her heavy-handed and weak-minded ban.
Such butthurt. Yes, I clarified the Moderator Impersonation rule to say that deleting mod edits is also impersonation, which I would have thought went without saying but then again this is a forum. You did break the rules twice, don't do that any more and you won't get banned.
anox wrote:If the new management team doesn't see such names as "Chief PeePooKaka" as being profoundly racist and insulting, and keeps tolerating them (even with a new set of forum's rules in place claiming that text or images that disparage religions, races, genders, age groups, or sexual orientations will not be tolerated) I see no way but, if that's possible, even further down for Salem. Thankfully so.
I honestly don't see how the name 'Chief PeePooKaKa' is profoundly insulting. It's certainly childish but if I started banning people for childishness, this forum would be empty in 5 minutes. The rules were written in such a way to allow the users to troll each other and have fun while keeping things from getting too out of hand. Or so we hope. If it turns out we need to add things like profanity filters or make the rules more strict then so be it, but we're going to try to go with these rules first.