Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
Jalpha wrote:Does this mean we can't use the f word again or is it a context specific rule?
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:Jalpha wrote:Does this mean we can't use the f word again or is it a context specific rule?
We very very very very much do not wish to overly limit speech. However, the details of the various freedoms not typically offered in other forums are still being reviewed by Legal. As such, we will just tread carefully for now and my official stance is that in most cases overly vulgar language only serves to lessen your position, not strengthen it.
Kaios wrote:Why the name TotalyMeow? TotalyMoo was annoying, I hope you're not him.
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:Kaios wrote:Why the name TotalyMeow? TotalyMoo was annoying, I hope you're not him.
It's not. But we couldn't resist when the name was suggested.
Vigilance wrote:Suffragium wrote:While I do agree to the racism, sexism etc, I do hope that the occasional joke of non-racistic character will be acceptable.
Shut up, Breeder.
JohnCarver wrote:Kaios wrote:Why the name TotalyMeow? TotalyMoo was annoying, I hope you're not him.
It's not. But we couldn't resist when the name was suggested.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests