Tribal Horde Presents Dances-With-Dudes

[Tonkyhonk]

*appeals*

so, what were you doing with DanneMM's account when he had lost his access to his own account since last october, then?
not like it matters, but arent you in the same boat as vigi if you find him guilty?

DanneMM > Sitting Bull apparently got ahold of it back in... october or something
Tonky > so you are the original swedish DanneMM, i assume?
DanneMM > Yes thats me Tonky
-
DanneMM > Honestly i just want him(loftar) to delete my account. Havent played since october

[Binks]

If you're going to continue contesting this, can you at least please try to meet the arguments I have already made, rather than just rehashing the exact same points that I have already written about at length?

He does this to everyone. He just reposts what he's already said over and over and over. This is pretty much why "Shut the ***** up Claeyt" is a thing. It's the only real response to anything he says.

As it stands, you only seem to me to be failing reading comprehension. Did you even read my verdict before posting?

No he probably didn't read anything you've wrote.

[Shill]

*appeals*

so, what were you doing with DanneMM's account when he had lost his access to his own account since last october, then?
not like it matters, but arent you in the same boat as vigi if you find him guilty?

DanneMM > Sitting Bull apparently got ahold of it back in... october or something
Tonky > so you are the original swedish DanneMM, i assume?
DanneMM > Yes thats me Tonky
-
DanneMM > Honestly i just want him(loftar) to delete my account. Havent played since october

What the user fails to mention is what he did with his account, for obvious reasons. As for the why you so go out of your way to discredit my previous post is so far removed, I'm failing to grasp it's relevence to the Issue I raised:

Denial of Service
Outside mechanics or device to shortstop mechanics already in place inside the game

Not account abuse, not account theft, not hacking, not cry babying about losses of items, or personal information.

If you would like to discuss an outside issue with me, you may start a topic in City Upon a Hill, and engage with me there Tonky. I thank you for your time in this matter.

With Regards,

Shill the Thief

[Tonkyhonk]

What the user fails to mention is what he did with his account, for obvious reasons.

what vigi did is log onto realaks *shared* account temporally when *you* and realak wanted to log onto it.
what you did is log onto DanneMMs *shared* account, changed pass to deny the original owners and his friends access forever, and you still keep it or kept it till this case.
what you do in game is another matter, and in-game "politics" does not give you a rightful excuse except for motivations.
i find both cases lame, but in court, your case sure sounds worse.

[Shill]

What the user fails to mention is what he did with his account, for obvious reasons.

what vigi did is log onto realaks *shared* account temporally when *you* and realak wanted to log onto it.
what you did is log onto DanneMMs *shared* account, changed pass to deny the original owners and his friends access forever, and you still keep it or kept it till this case.
what you do in game is another matter, and in-game "politics" does not give you a rightful excuse except for motivations.
i find both cases lame, but in court, your case sure sounds worse.

- October 2013???
- March 2014???
- Doesn't play????
- DoS????

I'm not going to entertain this any further, anyone with two brain cells will put together what you just said and laugh. Keep standing up for Vigilance all you like. I just ask that if you really want to beat the dead horse, do so in a public arena with myself in the appropriate sections of the forum, I will meet your charge head on, address your concerns, prove my case, destroy yours, and call it a good day.

With Regards,

Shill the Thief

[Tonkyhonk]

you also have this record in the past.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6189&hilit=Mvpeh

[naosnule]

appropriate sections of the forum

Whole thread has been about how you and Realak lost. Letting you engage in 1 vs 1 with Tonkyhonk would be relevant. Furthermore, since this is the House of Burgesses, there is far more wiggle room than in other sections.

[Tonkyhonk]

btw, for the sake of it, im not standing up for vigi, i find all three of you lame and i had a talk with vigi earlier as well. (and with realak too, the other day.)

Vigilance > Tonky, I am very well aware of how this situation has reflected on my character to be perceived by other people.
Vigilance > I do not need to hear preaching.

to those who have missed the official verdict, please go back to this page.

[Shill]

you also have this record in the past.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6189&hilit=Mvpeh

Also this:

rel·e·vance

1

a : relation to the matter at hand
b : practical and especially social applicability : pertinence <giving relevance to college courses>


2

the ability (as of an information retrieval system) to retrieve material that satisfies the needs of the user

"Relevance." Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 9 Mar. 2014.

Shall we address Realak's record as well? Vigilance too? Neither have a good record. Tonk's blabbering is like unto a slice of Swiss cheese. Don't worry Tonk, I was well informed of your **** talking of me in IRC 24/7, yet another ******* out in the bush condemning the flying witches in the night sky he made up in his dreams. I have no idea who in God's name you are, but your **** talking is on par with a kid from highschool who found out I banged his girlfriend behind his back.

Whatever my or anyone else(s) perceived or misconceived or even ill-conceived intentions may or may not have been, fairy tales or wishful thoughts, they are without the highest doubt, 150% regardless, baseless, irrelevant and erroneous as to the charge levied here today:

DENIAL OF SERVICE

As for the DanneMM irrelevance:

DanneMM gave the account to Lalliath/Tamasin, who gave it to myself. Not a single petition, request or remark has been heard by either party to have the account returned. This **** pile is on the level of Biddas attacking Claeyt in the same light -- stupid horse ****, go fork it some place else.

With Regards,

Shill the Thief

[jwhitehorn]

I'm going to derail the current derail to just thank Loftar and Jorb for looking into very serious concerns like this even when they are launched from unreputable parties who themselves have stolen accounts in the past. Its always nice to have the serious lines drawn in the sand and it seems like a lot of weight was placed on the number of failed attempts. I rest better knowing if somebody ran a bot that guessed my password wrong 6 million times and got it right on the 6 million and first time I would have a chance as compensation for losses, however, if I shared my password then I am *****. Good to know, and all the more reason that Tribal Council does not share passwords.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe