Claeyt wrote:loftar wrote:I didn't say that it's "okay", and I may well decide to pursue such cases at my own pleasure. In this particular case, however, there's also the other matters which I brought up that should be accounted for.
No, that's exactly what you just said.
You just said that Vigilance's multiple and numerous attempts at guessing another person's account based off his knowledge of that person's other account until he successfully guessed it was okay and fair game. Does this mean that my attempts at guessing another person's accounts are considered "part of the game"?
Utter *****.
Actaully, loftar said that there was no evidence of any failed attempts to login with the account:
Investigations shew that the initial Accusation does not stand up to scrutiny, seeing as how Vigilance, or for that matter anyone else , never even once used a wrong password in a failed attempt to log in to Realak's personal Account.
Loftar did not provide enough information about this: "(apart, incidentally, from Realak himself)" to conclude whether or not those failed attempts were part of an earlier effort at guessing that actually succeeded, thus allowing a perpetrator to later log in WITHOUT a failed attempt. No accusation, just an observation. I have to assume loftar already considered that and negated that based on IPs.