by MagicManICT » Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:46 pm
Amour_Vulpes wrote: The Constitution is absolute.
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
by Amour_Vulpes » Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:33 pm
MagicManICT wrote:-Scissors.-
by jesi » Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Amour_Vulpes wrote:MagicManICT wrote:-Scissors.-
What parts are you talking about? A majority of the original document has been over-ridden by the proceeding amendments. If you need an answer see Shill's post as it is pretty much the entire point.
aptson wrote:
when i make posts on the forums i expect people to spell it out for me because i am new . .
by Amour_Vulpes » Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:15 pm
jesi wrote:-Scissors.-
by MagicManICT » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:31 am
Amour_Vulpes wrote:Once you get past the bondage, BDSM, and sadomasochism take a right. The rabbit hole should be close then.
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
by Amour_Vulpes » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:56 am
MagicManICT wrote:-Scissors.-
by Claeyt » Mon Dec 30, 2013 1:20 am
Binks wrote:It all makes sense now.
[img]anti-masons
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
by Thor » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:34 am
Binks wrote:It all makes sense now.
saltmummy wrote:You sad sad little man, my heart weeps for you. Better not go outside or your thin, tissue paper like skin might spontaneously rupture while your fragile sensibilities violently shatter spraying salt and urine all over the street.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
