L33LEE wrote:The problem is not space, its resources.
You give only a redirect, but nothing to substantiate your statement. Then you give me this:
L33LEE wrote:Just goes to show you what kids are taught in school these days.
Ad hominem in persona, at best. But you don't put the breaks on, instead pedal to the floor with:
L33LEE wrote:If i had a catholic education i would have either of been molested by a person pretending to be a voice of god, or killed myself, perhaps both.
More inductive logic. Faulty.
L33LEE wrote:PS: I know the "STORY" of NOAH. Just like i know the story of the Three little pigs, nothing but nursery stories.
Historical accounts and nursery rhymes, are hardly the same thing. For an account, you either believe, or you don't. That belief is faith upon reasoning. Assigning it the status to that of a narrative(which I assume you're doing to conjoin it) as to downplay it to a nursery rhyme, is hardly reasoning at all.
Inb4 omg he used the word faith.
You'll find the other popular arguments against Historical Account are splitting hairs at best. Example, If I read two accounts of Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon, one will say he crossed at a tributary, and another near a shallow brook. Which is it? Who cares. Both say he crossed either way, and what happens afterward, happened. Therefor I reason and have faith, that is highly probable Caesar did in fact: Cross the Rubicon.
You either believe it, or you don't. Let's cut the patronizing non-sense and the talking of soft-soap.
With Regards,
Shill the Thief