Page 5 of 36

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:56 pm
by jwhitehorn
_Gunnar wrote:
I don't see how it is not bug abuse, unless jorb or loftar have stated somewhere that it is intended mechanics for people to be able to destroy an authed town bell while not the mayor.


Because letting people make items that cannot be destroyed is working as intended? I think not. Gallows Hill attempted to plug their walls with authority objects etc. etc. Luckily. All their bots, bugs, and hax couldn't save them from their own ignorance of refusing to use p-claims.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:58 pm
by TotalyMoo
_Gunnar wrote:
TotalyMoo wrote:Eager to see how they did it. It would be more than silly if it was a bug abuse though.


I don't see how it is not bug abuse, unless jorb or loftar have stated somewhere that it is intended mechanics for people to be able to destroy an authed town bell while not the mayor.


Oh, I was under the impression that with the right privileges you did not have to be mayor to take over a townbell by pclaim or something similar. Wasn't there a discussion about this the other day?

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:00 pm
by _Gunnar
jwhitehorn wrote:
_Gunnar wrote:
I don't see how it is not bug abuse, unless jorb or loftar have stated somewhere that it is intended mechanics for people to be able to destroy an authed town bell while not the mayor.


Because letting people make items that cannot be destroyed is working as intended? I think not. Gallows Hill attempted to plug their walls with authority objects etc. etc. Luckily. All their bots, bugs, and hax couldn't save them from their own ignorance of refusing to use p-claims.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe


This game isn't just about raiding though, its about social interaction, and destroying a vclaim should take time rather than being merely a matter of getting to the bell.Without a statement from one of the devs I refuse to believe this is intended game mechanics.

But I don't want to ruin this thread any further, post some pictures soon please..

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:03 pm
by gregl26
Hey Chief... you remember that day we stole Gallows Hill and re-named it BTK Lives? Good day...

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:04 pm
by jwhitehorn
gregl26 wrote:Hey Chief... you remember that day we stole Gallows Hill and re-named it BTK Lives? Good day...


Definitely one of my favorite days. Ranks right up there with that time that Jordan Coles built us a giant mountain with a Church on it.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:12 pm
by Chiprel
Loftar already confirmed it few days ago that breaking auth objects on claim is not intended.
As for chiefs raid it was partly legit. Just planted spy which opened outer gates and put claim with privilages for chief so he won't get debuffs/brazier fire. Then he bashed middle/hub gates and broke fighter alts leantos and summon killed em somewhere.
Then by making new claim on bell or resizing his spy claim he bashed bell which made all auth objects destroyable + nullified all braziers and whole village protection. Then simply he could take/destroy anything without any crime debuff. the end :roll:
As what I understand it should be impossible to bash auth objects when village have silver in bell. Only people with correct permissions/mayor should be able to destroy vclaim extensions. While bell should be only destroyable while empty.

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:26 pm
by Kaol
Not sure what to make of this really. I guess it highlights why vclaims need fixing. If the suggestions i made in the ideas thread were implemented then this would not have happened.

I couldn't care less about either side really, they are both zergs and nothing happened here but player vs building.

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:27 pm
by _Gunnar
Chiprel wrote:Loftar already confirmed it few days ago that breaking auth objects on claim is not intended.
As for chiefs raid it was partly legit. Just planted spy which opened outer gates and put claim with privilages for chief so he won't get debuffs/brazier fire. Then he bashed middle/hub gates and broke fighter alts leantos and summon killed em somewhere.
Then by making new claim on bell or resizing his spy claim he bashed bell which made all auth objects destroyable + nullified all braziers and whole village protection. Then simply he could take/destroy anything without any crime debuff. the end :roll:
As what I understand it should be impossible to bash auth objects when village have silver in bell. Only people with correct permissions/mayor should be able to destroy vclaim extensions. While bell should be only destroyable while empty.


Yeah, I would never say spying was not legit. But like you say the bell-bashing is a bug, pure and simple, which is what allows the chief to utterly destroy GH with a spy, something that should not be possible in a few hours work.

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:28 pm
by alloin
OW YEAH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG_6CopW9GQ

I see dem crying, BUGABUSE?! HAX!? INFILTRATORS !!!???

As legit as you guys are trying/have tried, but you fail, chief SUCCEEDED !

edit: where's bait & stax on that RIP list ?

Re: Offical Gallows Hill is dead thread

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:44 pm
by Dallane
alloin wrote:edit: where's bait & stax on that RIP list ?


bait is on there. no idea where he is tho. i think his computer finally died.

stax is still alive i think. at least the combat character is. farmstax doesn't have scents