Ursus wrote:There is no better protection against threats than the own readiness.
True, but most players don't have the time or extra people to watch their claim 24/7. And not all want to learn combat or build a strong character for that. At least the tribe is providing an alternative.
Ursus wrote:Tribe can not give any kind guarantee that the raids will not be performed by anyone. The strength of the tribe is too small for that.
Tribe does not reestablish the structures that was destroyed in the raid. If the raid happened, the tribe does not provide any help.
Sorry, but your arguments is laughable.
The strength of the tribe is not too small for that. They're tireless efforts have kept the Russian group off the server, a group that does a lot of raiding. They have tracked down and delt with other raiders as well,
before they can raid treaty payer's claims. I guess the unfortunate thing here is that it's hard to demonstrate how effective the tribe is based on things that didn't happen.
However, you are wrong about the tribe not helping when something does happen to a treaty payer. There are so few raids on Plymouth now that there hasn't been anything on the forums lately, but treaty payers have been raided in the past. The tribe has collected scents, tracked them to the criminal base, destroyed the base, and recovered loot; a generous portion of which was given to the treaty payer to help with recovery. That is what ever ranger offers.
Ursus wrote:Mereni wrote:They get someone safe to trade with
Tell me when abolished freedom of trade? Did I miss a patch the game?
I feel like something has to have gotten lost in translation here. Haven't you noticed that some players will offer to sell something, take the money from the barrel, and not give the item in return? Or take the item and refuse to pay the money. It happens a lot and has been the subject of many threads asking for safer trading. Having access to a trader you know won't scam you has nothing to do with free trade. The tribe is well known and has an interest in keeping a good reputation, so it's safe.
Ursus wrote:Mereni wrote:You've simply found a word you think is nice and charged with emotion to try to make people mad at the tribe and you're using it with no care for whether the word actually matches reality.
You are wrong, I do not have any emotions at all and just found the exact name for the results of the tribe activities.
You bring into the game some disgusting features of the real world.
I am sure that this is the most bright and direct expression of your democracy

And respect for human rights too, of course.
Sadly reality is badly matched with your words.
Again you're confused or something. I'm not saying you have any emotion regarding slavery though you clearly lie when you say you don't. I'm saying you picked that word because it's emotionally charged. It's inflamatory.
I'm also not sure what you're trying to do here. Are you trying to pretend this game is reality? It's a game and the ability to coerce other people is pretty limited. It's also not really possible to compare a game to the real world, not very well. The tribe is certainly not a democracy and has never claimed to be. If you want to compare it to a real government type, I suppose a Meritocracy is pretty close. Or maybe it's just your prejudice showing.