Salem

Good evening,

The choices offered were "fight, bribe, or die." I understand your consternation that they've only chosen to bribe or die, but these were laid out in the Chief's initial post, and should've been quickly identified as the most likely outcomes.

If you're hanking for bloodsport, the Tribe's offer to meet challengers 1-on-1 in an evenly matched fight remains. Why don't you former Rebellion boys see if you can drag Bait or Hustling out from their hiding places?

Faithfully,

-Paul the Paymaster

Ikpeip wrote:If you're hanking for bloodsport

Perhaps if you kept quiet about which towns were chosen and contacted them privately (or, perhaps, left signs outside their gates), and only announced the time and place publicly there would be less of a chance of 3rd party intervention.

jcwilk wrote:Perhaps if you kept quiet about which towns were chosen and contacted them privately (or, perhaps, left signs outside their gates), and only announced the time and place publicly there would be less of a chance of 3rd party intervention.

Your suggestion assumes we are less than entertained with Roanoke's willfulness to kill each other prior to our formal event requesting they kill each other. The net result is the same. Why should we change policy?

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

jwhitehorn wrote:

jcwilk wrote:Perhaps if you kept quiet about which towns were chosen and contacted them privately (or, perhaps, left signs outside their gates), and only announced the time and place publicly there would be less of a chance of 3rd party intervention.

Your suggestion assumes we are less than entertained with Roanoke's willfulness to kill each other prior to our formal event requesting they kill each other. The net result is the same. Why should we change policy?

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

It seems to undermine your ability to organize when anyone can swoop in and derail your events, or perhaps your ability to keep things together isn't one of your claims?

jcwilk wrote:It seems to undermine your ability to organize when anyone can swoop in and derail your events, or perhaps your ability to keep things together isn't one of your claims?

It seems to undermine your ability to have simple comprehension in the series of events. As it currently stands, I need merely to mention the name of a town and it falls under waste claim, loses a mayor, or gets completely scraped by none other than the citizens of the server itself. What greater power could there be than to whisper the name of a town and see it fall with little to no effort from yours truly. Only a fool would think that the Gladiator Program has been anything but a wild success. Perhaps not in entertainment to the masses, but most certainly in leveraged carnage and chaos. Each time a city falls for no other reason than a simple forum post by me, Plymouth presents itself as the true civilized land of safety and stability.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

Plymouth towns confirmed to be more durable