Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

[Argost]

You hit the nail on the head Paul. Pretty much the same thing I have been saying all along. The mods hold themselves above the rest. Whats good for us is not good for them. And honestly if Colsie girl don't want people to see him sporting his Justin Bieber hair cut he should remove all his pics. LOL. Anyhow, this will not go anywhere, just like all the other disputes against them. They will always have an excuse or "new" rule put in place to cover them when they are on the receiving end of the joke/harassment.

[DarkNacht]

The moderators have selectively enforced rules to benefit other moderators, tried to cover up the evidence, and now are trying to feed you **** while claiming it's sirloin.

When it comes to rulings in the grey areas of the rules the mods are going to tend to favor each other, when you target and harass mod in game for forum ruling. Also posting a log that you thought was going to be private and harassing and threating a mod are hardly the same thing.
One of the biggest problems with the mods is they let trolling and harassment bleed over into areas of the forums that are supposed to be free of that far too often and they let things like doxxing go on far to long.

[Argost]

The moderators have selectively enforced rules to benefit other moderators, tried to cover up the evidence, and now are trying to feed you **** while claiming it's sirloin.

When it comes to rulings in the grey areas of the rules the mods are going to tend to favor each other, when you target and harass mod in game for forum ruling. Also posting a log that you thought was going to be private and harassing and threating a mod are hardly the same thing.
One of the biggest problems with the mods is they let trolling and harassment bleed over into areas of the forums that are supposed to be free of that far too often and they let things like doxxing go on far to long.

If you are going to kiss the mods butt, I hear Colise likes that. Well his song says so. Heck he may write one about you too. Maybe call it "Broke back mounting"
As for the pic of the Chief with chest hair and a new necklace, I would like to know how that is Doxxing? and why it was modded? After looking at Jordans real life pics. I Can assure you he has more hair on his uni brow than any pic I seen of his chest hair.
- Removed -

I do not post this pic to be banned. This is the place to debate such rulings. But you show me where this depicts Jordan Coles in any way? And if you can not justify your ruling, I think you owe Binks an apology for abusing your mod powers to protect another mod. There is NOTHING in this pic that says hey I am jordan coles.

[Binks]

I hear what you're saying Argost!

- Removed -

[Argost]

I hear what your saying Argost!

- Removed -

I honestly had to look at that for a sec. At first I thought it was one of those monkeys that wear the red hats in a festivel. Still not sure what it is. I got old eyes man hehe.

[DarkNacht]

When it comes to rulings in the grey areas of the rules the mods are going to tend to favor each other, when you target and harass mod in game for forum ruling. Also posting a log that you thought was going to be private and harassing and threating a mod are hardly the same thing.
One of the biggest problems with the mods is they let trolling and harassment bleed over into areas of the forums that are supposed to be free of that far too often and they let things like doxxing go on far to long.

If you are going to kiss the mods butt, I hear Colise likes that. Well his song says so. Heck he may write one about you too. Maybe call it "Broke back mounting"

I like how saying that the mod don't actually do their only job is kissing the mods butts. The mods have one job, keep the forum under control(keep the politics in politics, the help in help, the trade in trade, ect.), but they let people like the Chief run around and trolling and harassing people in help and trade threads because they are too apathetic or afraid to discipline the brat. They even let him spam meaningless garbage all over the forum because he is upset that breaking the rules had consequences.

[sabinati]

RULES LAWYERING WILL CEASE FROM THIS POINT. POSTING IMAGES OF ANOTHER USER WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT IS NOW CARRIES THE POSSIBILITY OF A PERMABAN.

The following users are banned for one month for misbehavior.

Argost
Binks
Ikpeip
jwhitehorn

[Khaztropix]

RULES LAWYERING WILL CEASE FROM THIS POINT. POSTING IMAGES OF ANOTHER USER WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT IS NOW CARRIES THE POSSIBILITY OF A PERMABAN.

The following users are banned for one month for misbehavior.

Argost
Binks
Ikpeip
jwhitehorn

At what point did Ikpeip post a picture of someone?

[sabinati]

at what point did i say that he did?

[Khaztropix]

You made it seem like he did by lumping him in with the other people who did.

Why is it that the guy who brings up legitimate concerns with cited sources, receives the same ban as people who are posting personal pictures of other users? Isn't this the thread to bring up legitimate moderation concerns? Any ban, let a lone a one month ban for posting moderation complaints in the moderation complaint thread seems abusive.