TeckXKnight wrote:As stated, he is welcome to provide proof that the images he found were not on coles and were of random google images as he claims. Otherwise, in an attempt to recreate his claim, there has been no success.
We have in the past. It is redundant as all hell beyond that. Last note left was as recent as last night even.
jwhitehorn wrote:Ok.... Then why didn't the other moderators issue the board warning and/or pass judgement on this?
Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
I'm having a hard time deciphering your official response? The mods who reviewed the accusation from Coles didn't issue the discipline because you guys have issued it in the past? So you think Jordan Coles doing it THIS time will have a different outcome? I'm trying to find out why if a mod OTHER than Coles has confirmed that Binks is posting a necklace Coles owns then why didn't THAT MOD make the warning and come to the table?
Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe