TotalyMeow wrote:Orcling wrote:I think Claeyt is saying that the devs didnt care for 9 months, they wont care now.
On the contrary, we do care. Statements have been taken from both parties, other information has been gathered, the Biddas account has been temporarily banned because this issue of who the account should belong to needs to be settled, not because it broke any forum rule.
John Carver will make the decision on what should be done, and that will regrettably be postponed a few days until he has the time to look at it.
Until then, arguing about it won't actually affect the decision and is off-topic for this thread, though I suppose you may create a new thread about it if you are inspired to do so.
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
alprice wrote:
neored9 wrote:
MagicManICT wrote:
The new "weeaboo". We all want to go native American tribal now! To note, I find it offensive as an observer the same way most find slang racial names offensive, so.... I feel I should take action, but not sure where we're drawing the line yet.
Lenin wrote:alprice wrote:neored9 wrote:
As it stands we're in a TOS and EULA state oi limbo. That means it does, and does not, effect us currently. It is up to the new developers to update all of the basic legal speak now. In other words passing opinions means nothing. You could claim it is unethical, but that is about all it is right now.
TotallyMeow - when exactly does your studio plan on updating these tiny legal aspects? I'd imagine its being settled in Sweden currently in person; but that is just an assumption. Legal priorities always take priority in these first few months, hence my asking.MagicManICT wrote:
The new "weeaboo". We all want to go native American tribal now! To note, I find it offensive as an observer the same way most find slang racial names offensive, so.... I feel I should take action, but not sure where we're drawing the line yet.
Wouldn't any racial slang fall under §2, Content Regulations, No. 5? It is worded in a way to be vague on how severe the wording can be though. A more conservative holding would lean towards complete elimination of any, and all, offensive behaviors it would seem. Though you have a tendency to come off at a medium between a conservative and liberal interpretation of this. Now would be the time for the Head Forum Moderator to clarify.
Brona wrote:I'm stealing Winjun...
neored9 wrote:No, you agreed to the TOS when first downloaded Salem, MM now owns Salem and the TOS there of.
You known-ling used an account you had no right to. No different than accepting stolen goods. It doesn't matter if Biddas "gave" you the account, he didn't have the right to give it away.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
neored9 wrote:
No, there is no limbo. I don't know why you say that. Wishful thinking, Claeyt.
Claeyt wrote:
Lenin wrote:How exactly is causing more problems for everyone, as they do unto you at the same time, going to solve any of your, and their, problems? Seems to be a waste of a time. Similar to me making a response to it: A waste of time.
alprice wrote:I think you did a good job! And shame on you claeyt.
MagicManICT wrote:Dig through my old PMs because I can't be arsed to. Both of them were PMing about this then. I know they're there because I haven't hit my PM limit.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
Claeyt wrote:
neored9 wrote:Keep laughing, Claeyt, but it's not a ***** joke.
neored9 wrote:Keep laughing, claeyt, but it's not a ***** joke.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests