Trenial wrote:The term "polemic" there implied upon you actually believing the **** you were saying in regards to the moral conduct of Darwoth. You don't need to bring religion into this, it is not something to take lightly as *cough* "Secular Humanists" *cough* like you tend to do.
Furthermore, the term "atheist's playground" literally means, just that. Salem is a world without morality, laws, God, gods, creeds, or any system of measures. It is a seatribe sandbox, wherein Natural Selection is the only thing taking place. Measure is a huge philosophical term there kitten. Tell me, where is this measure you are using coming from? What decides Darwoth's conduct as closer or further away from that standard or measure. Where did you get it, and who decided it? If you use a "special pleading" fallacy against me, I'll ignore you. If you say you don't know, than quit with the morality spiel.
KILL OR BE KILLED. If you do not like this, than I am sure ZYNGA has plenty of titles that will suit you just fine.
![Trollface ¦]](./images/smilies/troll.gif)
Unfortunately all the language barriers prevents me to escalate this discussion to a higher level, as i dont know the majority of hermeneutics terms on english. But i understand the meaning of your argumentation, and disagree with your proposition claiming that the game world of Salem is ruled by a different mindset than the one applied on the real world. There isnt any intrinsecal morality, creed, or ruleset on our world too since we dont have the, the measurements we have now are the result of social evolution, and since we (and the creators of the game) are a product of this society, we should carry our own conceptions of morality to this virtual world, who is a simple extension of our own. As i said about the golden rule, the simple possibility that i can be harming someone by my actions, are reason enough to not do it, and vice-versa.