The Second Age Treaty

[jwhitehorn]

Great Questions:

I'm interested in any checks and balances, here.

There is no check and balance. The Tribe is the final say on all authoritative measures, and as proven in times previous that we will not abuse this power.

I'm interested in any checks and balances, here.

Also, is there any sort of Mission Statement like in the preamble to the US Constitution? [/quote]
There are 4,000+ Posts by me. If you would like you could copy them all into one giant document and it would function much like a constitution of Salem.

What is the Tribe's ultimate purpose and so forth?

Peace, Justice, and the American way.

Who decides on changes to the Treaty?

The Tribal Council.

Is there anything that would prevent the Tribe from suddenly charging TMs in the future?

Nothing but our word. However, the word of a Tribeman is the most sacred and reliable thing you will ever encounter. The Treaty will not cost silver in the 2nd age.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

[belgear]

That guy looks like he is ***** a boot.

[Zapt13]

Chief,

I've read many of your posts and I appreciate your way with words. I have also seen no case brought against you with any convincing evidence whatsoever where you acted without adequate warning or outside of the Treaty. I must admit that the ZERO SILVER cost of the new Treaty is attractive, but will there be other costs such as tribute or trade? The posted points about not settling on Burial Grounds and so forth are a cost, of course, but I'm curious about on-going costs or costs scalable to a player's footprint on the world, productive capacity, etc.

I am also uncomfortable with the consolidation of power. Is there any hope for a player participating in the Treaty to be invited to join the Tribal Council? Is there any hope for the participants at large to amend the Treaty in the future? Will the Tribal Council entertain discussion in public session, or are their decisions kept secret and mysterious?

[jwhitehorn]

but will there be other costs such as tribute or trade?

There will be no requirements that I would classify as Tribute. However, if the needs of the people, server, world require the actions of its people and if mother nature and/or The Greater Spirit require something of their people we could and most likely would require the Treaty Members to comply.

but I'm curious about on-going costs or costs scalable to a player's footprint on the world, productive capacity, etc.

The world is large enough to handle even the largest of footprints. We see no reason to implement scale into any equations. Besides. 300% of Free, is still free.

Is there any hope for a player participating in the Treaty to be invited to join the Tribal Council?

Anyone may become a brave and join the Tribal Council at any time. Only the strongest of the strong are able to do such a task, and as such, the people of Salem are lead by a coalition of the competent.

Is there any hope for the participants at large to amend the Treaty in the future? Will the Tribal Council entertain discussion in public session, or are their decisions kept secret and mysterious?

Tribal Council discussions are held behind closed doors, however, their decisions, and the rationale behind them are immediately dispersed to Braves non-classified information will be given to Treaty Members in the form of a monthly announcement.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

[L33LEE]

I wish to know more of this "tribal horde" can you elaborate abit ?

[mrrummenie]

If i may make a suggestion for an amendment to the treaty rules... requiring all player to provide their location seams potentially dangerous. what about placing a sign next to our homestead that can be referenced to our sign of the treaty??

[Ikpeip]

Good evening,

If i may make a suggestion for an amendment to the treaty rules... requiring all player to provide their location seams potentially dangerous. what about placing a sign next to our homestead that can be referenced to our sign of the treaty??

Your solution seems far more dangerous to the treaty members - as well as far less manageable from an administrative point of view.

Faithfully,

-Peter

[Gallient]

Chief, I have for long worshiped The Jorgen. My people believe that Jorgen is the three-faced supreme ruler. He is represented by Loftar, the creator, Jorb, the destroyer, and the knowable spirit put on this world to give us divine instructions.

Is Jorgen worship still allowed?

[DeepSixed]

Of course... TMS... if you disagree with the Tribe at any time later on- he knows where you live and can destroy you at his leisure.

The real issue is giving up your location. Never do that unless you trust someone absolutely.


They are going to reel you in early with promises of little for nothing; and then bank you later when you have something to lose... as I said before- give up your location- that person or group owns you.

Tribe is not trustworthy. They'll burn you in a heartbeat if they get bored.

[Khaztropix]

Chief, I have for long worshiped The Jorgen. My people believe that Jorgen is the three-faced supreme ruler. He is represented by Loftar, the creator, Jorb, the destroyer, and the knowable spirit put on this world to give us divine instructions.

Is Jorgen worship still allowed?

Welcome back, drinking buddy.