Claeyt wrote:the more I read the 2 the more you can see THEY ARE 2 SEPARATE REPORTED STORIES. They have different dates, different facts.
Except the 'facts' in the first story were shown to be not actually facts because they are false. That's why the story was utterly changed. But if even you can see that these are two entirely separate stories, how are you okay with the AP pretending they are the same, that the first never even existed, and not mentioning anywhere that they changed anything?
Chrumps wrote:“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”
"Updating" press documents was exactly the kind of job the main character of 1984 was doing.
Yeah, this is exactly why I'm upset.