Frakked wrote:or drunk eventually... .
someone is projecting reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaally hard.
Frakked wrote:or drunk eventually... .
§1.2. The Forum Rules apply to the whole forum, including but not limited to: Private messages (PMs), profile information and the individual sub-forums.
§2.5. No pornographic, racist or otherwise discriminatory or inappropriate text or images. This can include, but is not limited to: overly abusive, sexist, or racist language; disparaging any religion, race, gender, age group, or sexual orientation, threatening persons with actions in real life. The moderation team is the final arbiter of what is or is not inappropriate.
§2.7. Do not post personal data without permission. Personal information (such as real life name, address or photo) of a user may not be posted without the express consent of the person or people concerned. Any posting of one's own personal data is entirely at the user's own risk, and when posted to the forum, is considered to be consent.
Icon wrote:This isn't Farmville with fighting, its Mortal Kombat with corn.
Suffragium wrote:I love sausages.
Vigilance wrote:I wouldn't consider PM's the same as public posting, at all. Absolutely ridiculous.
Brona wrote:Vigilance wrote:I wouldn't consider PM's the same as public posting, at all. Absolutely ridiculous.
It doesn't matter what you people think. I think pot should be legal but if I walk down the street smoking a joint in my town I'm going to end up in handcuffs.
Suffragium wrote:I love sausages.
Brona wrote:I don't believe that picture was publicly available. It doesn't matter that it was a private communication. If i sent you a picture of yourself and you were unsure of how I had gotten it wouldn't that make you feel uncomfortable? If they had a picture they could plausibly know where he lives. It isn't alright to make someone fear for their real life safety to any degree.
Ikpeip wrote:The rules as I read them state public information revealed by person themselves is fair game. If that picture was grabbed from a Facebook account created under the same persona as used in the forums, it'd be open season. But grabbing photographs from someone's Facebook account under their real-life name and then parading them in front of the supposed-to-be anonymous person here is, in fact, a malicious act. There's no legitimate purpose for this other than "I've been trying to track you down and I know you who are."
You spelled publicly wrong.
Claeyt wrote:JohnCarver wrote:Why do you think this means we have taken sides in your latest crusade to force your opinions on others? The better question here, is why did you put it on if you don't like it?
My opinions? You think that I'm the only one that thinks that blacks aren't genetically inferior sub-species? I get banned for reposting some of Darwoth's racist images (and for your info TotallyMeow he actually has posted that exact image here on these forums also) and arguing against Judaism's insanity and you give me a dunce cap for that? What exactly are your opinions on their racist posts John? Do you disagree with their views or not?
loftar wrote:Claeyt wrote:Loftar's hatred of European immigrants.
Please do elaborate on this.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
Kaios wrote:Brona wrote:I don't believe that picture was publicly available. It doesn't matter that it was a private communication. If i sent you a picture of yourself and you were unsure of how I had gotten it wouldn't that make you feel uncomfortable? If they had a picture they could plausibly know where he lives. It isn't alright to make someone fear for their real life safety to any degree.
God you sound like such a little *****. I know you are only playing things along to make the ban seem like it was fair and I understand that as a member of the Tribe and all-around piece of **** that's just what you have to do and I'm okay with that.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests