So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Forum for off topic and general discussion.

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby joshnpk » Sat Jul 05, 2014 1:26 am

I don't think Claeyt will ever learn.
I think I have a hat problem.
User avatar
joshnpk
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:53 am
Location: UK

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Dallane » Sat Jul 05, 2014 3:15 am

Claeyt wrote:
User banned for 7 days for continuously breaking the rules almost immediately after a previous ban was lifted and despite numerous warnings both on the board and in PMs. I've truly been far too lenient in this matter, so that is going to end now.

~TotalyMeow[/m]


Image
Please click this link for a better salem forum experience

TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
User avatar
Dallane
Moderator
 
Posts: 15195
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Kaios » Sat Jul 05, 2014 4:10 am

loftar wrote:Well now, as you may have noticed, I never actually did that. I'm just saying that whether you agree with John or not in singling Claeyt out, it was not done for no reason, and there's really noone else quite like Claeyt on the forum.


Oh I see, you aren't the cause of the problem, just a contributor? It could be argued that it was yourself and Jorb who chose these individuals in the first place to run this game and thus are directly responsible for their actions, both good and bad.
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby loftar » Sat Jul 05, 2014 5:22 am

Kaios wrote:Oh I see, you aren't the cause of the problem, just a contributor?

It's just that you made it sounds as if I were the one who did it, so I couldn't really respond to your question in the context of this specific case, but if you actually want a generic answer to your question, let's look at it again:
Kaios wrote:So it's ok to single someone out and treat them poorly provided they have done something to offend you?

Clearly, the general answer to this question is "yes". If someone does something to offend you, then I'd certainly argue that it's okay to treat them poorly. That's almost true by definition. I doubt the question you're actually asking is quite that generic, however, but you'll have to clarify it a bit if it actually is a serious answer you want.
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 7:32 am
Location: In your character database, shuffling bits

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby neored9 » Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:41 am

Yasso wrote:Doesn't make moderation any less crappy.


You consider banning a high profile toxic poster for breaking the rules bad moderation? Derp derp.
User avatar
neored9
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:28 pm

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Kaios » Sat Jul 05, 2014 12:11 pm

loftar wrote:Clearly, the general answer to this question is "yes". If someone does something to offend you, then I'd certainly argue that it's okay to treat them poorly. That's almost true by definition. I doubt the question you're actually asking is quite that generic, however, but you'll have to clarify it a bit if it actually is a serious answer you want.


Sure Loftar, I thought the question in relation to what is going on was pretty clear but since you're obviously incapable of discerning the situation for yourself, here's some clarification you god damned cretin.

Here is the question rephrased:

If all that someone has done to offend you is give their opinion, why does that give you the right to single them out and treat them poorly?
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Michael » Sat Jul 05, 2014 1:39 pm

Isn't Claeyt just trolling us? I thought he always posted the way he does to go offtopic/ get people riled up. Think about it.
Michael
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:16 am

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Murphy » Sat Jul 05, 2014 2:15 pm

Michael wrote:Isn't Claeyt just trolling us? I thought he always posted the way he does to go offtopic/ get people riled up. Think about it.


Why don't we give everyone a dunce cap then and ban them for a week when they post pictures of the harassment they receive in-game for stating their opinion on the forums
User avatar
Murphy
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:21 am

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Dallane » Sat Jul 05, 2014 2:48 pm

Michael wrote:Isn't Claeyt just trolling us? I thought he always posted the way he does to go offtopic/ get people riled up. Think about it.


This is a 100% troll.
Please click this link for a better salem forum experience

TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
User avatar
Dallane
Moderator
 
Posts: 15195
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Hose » Sat Jul 05, 2014 2:51 pm

I want my free Dunce Cap now ¦]
My dog walks me to the park and doggy styles me, if you find that weird you're an arrogant gender-assuming bloodthirsty gun-loving cisgender bestial sexist incestuous white-previlege misogynistic biased raped privileged Nazi slave owner terrorist lesbian.
User avatar
Hose
 
Posts: 2307
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:39 am

PreviousNext

Return to City upon a Hill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron