Claeyt wrote:loftar wrote:Claeyt wrote:Can I see some examples?![]()
This thread is one of my favorites, where you attempt to chew me out for something that I explicitly stated the opposite of, and then, even when that error had been pointed out, continue to argue other things which I had already explicitly addressed. My absolute favorite part of that thread has to be that you then brought back up that argument the error of which you had explicitly accepted as an error after it had been pointed out by Champie, as if that just never happened.loftar wrote:Of course, this is far from the only time you do these things; it's just the one where I was most directly involved myself. I would've thought that you at least had the self-insight to know that you do these things. Do you simply not read the posts you respond to, or are you willfully ignoring their contents?
Snowpig wrote:awww, c'mon:
Claeyt wrote: I'm not saying it's right or justified that they steal or sell drugs or murder cops I'm saying that that's exactly what you would do if you were poor and desperate and Black.
Claeyt wrote:loftar wrote:Claeyt wrote:Can I see some examples?![]()
This thread is one of my favorites, where you attempt to chew me out for something that I explicitly stated the opposite of, and then, even when that error had been pointed out, continue to argue other things which I had already explicitly addressed. My absolute favorite part of that thread has to be that you then brought back up that argument the error of which you had explicitly accepted as an error after it had been pointed out by Champie, as if that just never happened.
The opposite of? Are you still talking about the cartoon?
What error? I was crashing in Kand's and Ender's. I fixed it. Champie's wasn't crashing, so what. I erased all and updated.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
Snowpig wrote:awww, c'mon:
colesie wrote:Edit: WOW YOU PEOPLE ADDED CENSORS TO THIS FORUM?
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
Dallane wrote:colesie wrote:Edit: WOW YOU PEOPLE ADDED CENSORS TO THIS FORUM?
What do you mean "you people"?
Can we ban jordan coles for racism now?
Claeyt wrote:loftar wrote:Claeyt wrote:Can I see some examples? :lol:
This thread is one of my favorites, where you attempt to chew me out for something that I explicitly stated the opposite of, and then, even when that error had been pointed out, continue to argue other things which I had already explicitly addressed. My absolute favorite part of that thread has to be that you then brought back up that argument the error of which you had explicitly accepted as an error after it had been pointed out by Champie, as if that just never happened.
The opposite of? Are you still talking about the cartoon?
What error? I was crashing in Kand's and Ender's. I fixed it. Champie's wasn't crashing, so what. I erased all and updated.
TruthTeller wrote:Banok wrote:Anyone mentioning genetics within discussions about race is utterly ignorant. Races do not exist scientifically speaking, they are purely a social construct. There is less genetic diversity between black and white people than between different tribes in africa (because all our ancestors came from africa 200k years ago). skin colour is a negligible fraction of our genes which define how humans differ from each other. Yes, there are genetic differences between populations, but there is more variety within a population still than between populations. And there are no genes exclusive to populations or what society define as races. The only subspecies of modern humans are all extinct, we are all 100% the same species, but interestingly some of the slight diversity between human populations is due to interbreeding with those extinct sub-species. For instance our European ancestors interbred with Neanderthals, which one could argue makes us less advanced than africans.
Source: degree in biology specialising in evolution, human genetics, population genetics, etc. And no I didn't actually bother to read this whole thread, I just feel like injecting this into here
Vaguely related question: as a biologist, how do you see on the result of adoption studies where they do IQ-testing of negroids and caucasians to find out if there is a genetic basis connected to being a negroid/caucasian for a difference in IQ?
Darwoth wrote:saying there is no genetic difference between race and tendecies toward certain behavior patterns based on racial makeup as a result is laughable and tells me your "biology degree" came from classes taught by people like claeyt.
there are major strides in the pharamceutical industry to tailor drugs specifically to the genes of individual races to make them more effective, if we were "all the same" that would not be possible and hundreds of millions would not be getting dumped into their development.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests