So Are The New Dev's Siding With Darwoth's Racism?

Forum for off topic and general discussion.

Re: So why are the new dev's siding with Darwoth's Racism?

Postby Orcling » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:46 pm

I Darwoth now.
Image Redacted

I don't care if it's a cartoon, porn isn't allowed on this forum. That's a 3 day ban.

~TotalyMeow


Champie wrote:
Orcling wrote:Why is Claeyt allowed to continously double post? Thats against the Forum rules.

My understanding is that you cannot embed more than 4 quotes in a single thread. It appears to me that Claeyt is working within the constraints of the forum while attempting to address each issue that is being hurled at him.


But neither of those two Doubleposts has more than 2 Quotes. He couldve easily put everything into a single Post.
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby JohnCarver » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:47 pm

Claeyt wrote:I am not lying about need to kin someone and give them permissions. Why would I lie about this? This is my main merchant character I use him for trading and for introducing new players to the game and to my towns that I recruit them to. Why would you think that I am lying to you? Come onto the skype chat with us and talk to the guy if you don't believe me or we can switch over to Teamspeak if you want and you can talk to him.


You can both kin and give permissions from the default client.
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.

Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
User avatar
JohnCarver
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6826
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 3:02 am

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Champie » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:50 pm

JohnCarver wrote:You can both kin and give permissions from the default client.


Are you saying that you will continue to develop the game in such a way that makes it difficult or impossible for some players of your choosing to enjoy Salem using an accepted and widely adopted third party client?
User avatar
Champie
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:24 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Kaios » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:52 pm

JohnCarver wrote:
Your response:

Contains profanity
Asks questions in a manner that leads the reader to believe things that are simply not true.
Complains that the character is bugged when the hat was always intended to be equip able once.
Continues to pretend that you cannot use the character because of the hat when you already admitted you can log into him now.
Assumes that Tribe accounts have the authority to do anything or have special dev powers.
Lies that you need these things to happen in order to talk to somebody


You cannot seem to manage a simple apology without lying, or misleading the general public over and over again. I asked you to try to do something as simple as apologizing for your transgressions against this community, and you return with simply more transgressions. Perhaps you really are as beyond help as the community makes you out to be.


Not that I feel Claeyt started out acting in any unreasonable manner, but would it not be more suiting for the new developer to take the moral high ground in this case? This entire situation would be so easily solved if you were to just stop acting like this power hungry child and do the job you're supposed to do.

Apologize for his transgressions? Shut the ***** up man, what are you even saying??! How could you have supposedly tested the hat extensively after his claims of crashing and so forth and not found the cause lay somewhere within a custom client? That's not really extensive testing when you fail to find out the cause of an issue you created with some silly attempt to... I don't even know... be humorous?

Take the L on this one, fix the problem or get rid of the hat.
Last edited by Kaios on Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby joshnpk » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:54 pm

Champie wrote:
JohnCarver wrote:You can both kin and give permissions from the default client.


Are you saying that you will continue to develop the game in such a way that makes it difficult or impossible for some players of your choosing to enjoy Salem using an accepted and widely adopted third party client?


Are you mad? how does not fixing Somebody else's software mean they are developing the game in such a game to not support custom clients?
I think I have a hat problem.
User avatar
joshnpk
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:53 am
Location: UK

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Claeyt » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:55 pm

JohnCarver wrote:
Claeyt wrote:I am not lying about need to kin someone and give them permissions. Why would I lie about this? This is my main merchant character I use him for trading and for introducing new players to the game and to my towns that I recruit them to. Why would you think that I am lying to you? Come onto the skype chat with us and talk to the guy if you don't believe me or we can switch over to Teamspeak if you want and you can talk to him.


You can both kin and give permissions from the default client.

Are you saying that I am now forced to use the basic client to do anything? I really only have one question:

"Are you even able to remove the hat from my character?"
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child


As the river rolled over the cliffs, my own laughing joy was drowned out by the roaring deluge of the water. The great cataract of Darwoth's Tears fell over and over endlessly.
User avatar
Claeyt
 
Posts: 5166
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:02 pm

Re: So why are the new dev's siding with Darwoth's Racism?

Postby TotalyMeow » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:55 pm

You can embed as many quotes as you want in a post, you just can't nest more than three deep in any single quote.
Community Manager for Mortal Moments Inc.

Icon wrote:This isn't Farmville with fighting, its Mortal Kombat with corn.
User avatar
TotalyMeow
 
Posts: 3782
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:14 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Vigilance » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:56 pm

Personally, I wouldn't, even if I could. ¦]

You've done an excellent job of making yourself a retard in everyone's eyes.
Image
Suffragium wrote:I love sausages.
User avatar
Vigilance
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:40 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Orcling » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:57 pm

Kaios wrote:stop acting like this power hungry child and do the job you're supposed to do.

If I remember correctly, this game is Free, thus, you haven't actually paid for anything. The devs have no obligation whatsoever to you, they can, literally, do whatever the ***** they want. Its their Sandpit and if they wanna knock your sandcastle over, they have every right to do so. Sure you can be mad about it and refuse to eat your soup, but that's about it.
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

Re: Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

Postby Champie » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:58 pm

joshnpk wrote:
Are you mad? how does not fixing Somebody else's software mean they are developing the game in such a game to not support custom clients?


I didn't say that. I asked if this was an example of the quality of work we can expect. The devs created a hat and gave it to one person. The hat has apparently made it difficult or impossible for that player to enjoy Salem using a widely adopted third party client. So far, the dev has suggested that the player in question can do his business on the default client. That's fine, but I would like to know if this behavior will continue or if it is something that the devs wish to avoid. It is a valid question.
User avatar
Champie
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to City upon a Hill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests