... Officially not endorsing stuff that's officially being condoned while being officially prohibited by a EULA makes officially perfect sense. ...
O, well. Common sens seems generally the first victim in power struggles.
MvGulik wrote:... Officially not endorsing stuff that's officially being condoned while being officially prohibited by a EULA makes officially perfect sense. ...
O, well. Common sens seems generally the first victim in power struggles.
MvGulik wrote:... Officially not endorsing stuff that's officially being condoned while being officially prohibited by a EULA makes officially perfect sense. ...
O, well. Common sens seems generally the first victim in power struggles.
TotalyMoo wrote:MvGulik wrote:... Officially not endorsing stuff that's officially being condoned while being officially prohibited by a EULA makes officially perfect sense. ...
O, well. Common sens seems generally the first victim in power struggles.
I'll ask our legal team to take a second look at it.
MvGulik wrote:Roger.
Although I'm way to skeptical to expect anything significant to change (time will tell of course), I do appreciate that action.
(a person who plays online games since the 1980s about salem) laywn wrote:I have never seen anything so down right dirty!
Chiprel wrote:MvGulik wrote:... Officially not endorsing stuff that's officially being condoned while being officially prohibited by a EULA makes officially perfect sense. ...
O, well. Common sens seems generally the first victim in power struggles.
Lets just call it paradox .
TotalyMoo wrote:So I've talked with the legal team and apparently you were right.
This part of the EULA will be modified to correctly state our standpoint on the issue the next time we update it, which is somewhere within three months.
L33LEE wrote:TotalyMoo wrote:So I've talked with the legal team and apparently you were right.
This part of the EULA will be modified to correctly state our standpoint on the issue the next time we update it, which is somewhere within three months.
So what is this "stand point"?
Will the EULA say use of bots / macros / mods is Legal ? (I been waiting for this, means i can finally load my own client with mega multiboxing botting cababilitys. This forest will be copped down and converted to 10,000 lumber piles in a week i can assure you.)
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Dallane wrote:L33LEE wrote:TotalyMoo wrote:So I've talked with the legal team and apparently you were right.
This part of the EULA will be modified to correctly state our standpoint on the issue the next time we update it, which is somewhere within three months.
So what is this "stand point"?
Will the EULA say use of bots / macros / mods is Legal ? (I been waiting for this, means i can finally load my own client with mega multiboxing botting cababilitys. This forest will be copped down and converted to 10,000 lumber piles in a week i can assure you.)
You could of done this ages ago. He has already said in this thread their stance.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests