jophbot wrote:Lazun123 wrote:jophbot wrote:Outsider's view - and I say this knowing full well that non-American opinions don't count for squat, with the USA being the centre of the known universe and all, but this guy talks sense:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtIm9j4JYks
No offense bro, but how did you sit through all 30mins of that??? Fool was putting me to sleep. Also Hilary most qualified?? Please that statement alone proves he is just another Hill bot. More then likely on her payroll.
Not sure how you got to that conclusion when his summary of her was 'the lesser of 2 evils' ... qualifications by definition are quantifiable and comparable so if you are going to argue a point perhaps you might like to choose a bit more wisely ... I would always suggest people take whatever personal chips are on their shoulders off the scales when weighing facts rather than being herded by media marketing, but hey whatever keeps you warm at night I guess.
I will say that maybe i should have heard what he had to say fully as i am basing what i initially said after the first 10mins of his talk. But i couldnt go on as i would be asleep and unable to to.
She may have a "resume" saying she is "qualified", but really she was **** at most of her jobs, she has no real claim of great achievements. She advanced in her career through her husbands name, lies, threats/murders, favors and bribes. So this is why i disagree with your implication or this guys implication that she is "qualified".
**** if i could cheat my way into any job i would have been a gynecologist and be a basement dweller thats touched vagina!
As far as being a media drone, I unlike some of my foreign salemites have followed the Clintons for years now, and can say they are the most corrupt politicians in our government. The emails are for everybody to see, despite the media constantly trying cover for the Clinton. So if you think the media is twisting people away from Clinton, sadly you are very off.