by Judaism » Fri Dec 21, 2018 3:28 am
4 orso hours a day is indeed quite casual in my book indeed, you clearly have not played alongside hardcore gamers, or competitive ones. (I simply assume and expect the majority of the Commies to at least play those hours, if not more since figures like Heffernan were in that group) If that is true, then it is fairly hypocrite to state that someone else is playing 24/7 with a smaller group, simply because they beat you in each and every aspect.
In the text prior to that you list a definition of casual, which is very subjective as I just stated. It indeed was fairly irregular, nearly daily on the other hand but when you spend 2 hours on a monday and then 4 hours on a saturday remains occasionally for me. A hardcore group, you could commit to a 5 hour rate at any given time, which we were for example limited to the weekends.
I've had semesters with only 10-15 hours a week and when you consume information quickly you might end up with a crap load of time and that is where playing hardcore can be possible, or simply be a basement dweller.
So I firmly hold ground that I have not made any contradictions, other than interpreting posts and comments differently, from random threads where I state something about Concord. I am sure you'll find many contradictions if you will read comments/reactions on entire different threads and a period ago.
Using that is present arguments is just retarded and proves that you have no valid arguments, like I said show the time-slots. We were barely present on it and we won the server with a quite casual approach. (bear in mind that we started out hardcore in a vacation period for 1-2 weeks), everything after that was absolutely peanuts regarding average hours a day spent.
It eventually is up to me how I perceive a casual approach, perhaps its super hardcore for the likes of you but then again you state 24/7, while I state that most players did not play more than 4/24 a day, most certainly not during the week.
Do not think you can judge how much time we have invested into Concord in total and claim it with some sort of certainty, based on literally nothing you claim that the entire group played it hardcore. Other than that you state that people have no life, while I repeatedly mention to you that everyone had obligations and carried on with their life during Concord. Unlike trash like Heffernan for example, we all have lifes and obviously when you imply differently without any proper validation or whatsoever, I will not stand for it.
The perspective you have is awfully wrong, we are the only ones that can estimate the total time invested and until now you have not provided anything to indicate that we would have to play more than a few hours a day each, which in general we really didn't other than some sessions during the weekends so now and then. In short, I do not like people that think to know what people do, say and mean with barely any context or information. That clearly is the type of person you are, well you are wrong and it'll be an endless debate on something which is out of your reach to grasp or to fill in.
No more than that was needed to bring the Concord victory home, while still beating the competition in nearly every aspect.
JohnCarver wrote:Mortal Moments Inc. is not here to cannibalize the community or piece out the code. We are not here because we wish to institute pay to win models or PvE servers. Quite the contrary.