The Cost of a Weak Leader

Forum for In-Game politics, relations, matters of justice, and other in-game topics.

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Binks » Thu May 29, 2014 4:11 am

Jalpha wrote:Because leap-at is lame. PvP is lame. Leap-at until somebody ***** up or gets hit by it twice in succession. Try to get free thrusts. Just ***** off with that ****, it's overdone and it's boring.

Two...

Move...

PvP...

Keep thinking that there is only two viable moves. I like it. Makes it so much easier to train wreck you *****.
User avatar
Binks
 
Posts: 1515
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:39 pm

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Jalpha » Thu May 29, 2014 4:22 am

Because you can still use parry and stomp is so viable right?
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Binks » Thu May 29, 2014 4:24 am

Jalpha wrote:Because you can still use parry and stomp is so viable right?

I'm not here to teach you. Unless you want a duel to the death with me.
User avatar
Binks
 
Posts: 1515
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:39 pm

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Jalpha » Thu May 29, 2014 4:27 am

You aren't fooling anyone. It would almost be worth it to show how PvP is reduced to a string of leap-ats and thrusts.

I shouldn't be having this discussion though, as previously stated I have no idea what I'm talking about...
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Binks » Thu May 29, 2014 5:49 am

Jalpha wrote:as previously stated I have no idea what I'm talking about...

Yes, please shut the ***** up. You are worse than Claeyt.
User avatar
Binks
 
Posts: 1515
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:39 pm

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby jwhitehorn » Thu May 29, 2014 5:53 am

Jalpha wrote:I shouldn't be having this discussion though, as previously stated I have no idea what I'm talking about...


Thank you, This was getting mind numbing.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Jalpha » Thu May 29, 2014 7:48 am

jwhitehorn wrote:Thank you, This was getting mind numbing.


Sorry we can talk about something you're good at if you like. Killing alts, or running away? Feel free to share your thoughts...
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby jwhitehorn » Thu May 29, 2014 8:32 am

Jalpha wrote:Sorry we can talk about something you're good at if you like. Killing alts, or running away? Feel free to share your thoughts...


Never done either.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby neored9 » Thu May 29, 2014 12:05 pm

Jalpha wrote:
Mereni wrote:It's also not ad hominim because he's questioning your methods of arguing your points, not saying they are invalid because of your personal traits or habits.

:roll:

neored9 wrote:Jalpha, you are guilty of the following crimes against intellect.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129326#p129326


Well I apologise for trying to be amusing. I explained my real reasons at least twice, they were ignored, or ****** counter-arguments were provided.

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129291#p129291


A common tribal tactic, as explained. If you can do it then so can I.

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129386#p129386


I am attempting to negotiate a situation in which the goals of both parties are met. Your argument is invalid.

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129285#p129285


This point was later backed up with personal experience and the fact that the tribe is untrustworthy in other matters. Why would people be somehow expected to believe the tribe can do one honourable thing...

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129287#p129287


Totally related to the argument at hand. In fact your rebuttal is tu-quoquo.

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-emotion
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129289#p129289


There was a valid argument included, does it still count?

Your ****** astounds me. This leads into an endless circlejerk I'd rather not sully myself with (plus it's boring). You're clasping at straws here, straws so lame and futile that it's hardly worth me replying at all.


Nah, you got ***** again.
User avatar
neored9
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:28 pm

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Jalpha » Thu May 29, 2014 12:53 pm

Well if you say so then it must be true...
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

cron