The Cost of a Weak Leader

Forum for In-Game politics, relations, matters of justice, and other in-game topics.

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Jalpha » Thu May 29, 2014 1:00 am

Hypocrite pls go.
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby neored9 » Thu May 29, 2014 1:17 am

Jalpha wrote:Hypocrite pls go.


*source not cited
User avatar
neored9
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:28 pm

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Jalpha » Thu May 29, 2014 1:24 am

neored9 wrote:*source not cited


Burden of proof.
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am



Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Mereni » Thu May 29, 2014 3:34 am

It's also not ad hominim because he's questioning your methods of arguing your points, not saying they are invalid because of your personal traits or habits.
User avatar
Mereni
 
Posts: 1839
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:26 am

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Binks » Thu May 29, 2014 3:55 am

Jalpha wrote:
Binks wrote:There is a very little difference between thrust and the punches.

Jalpha wrote:There is a lot of difference when leap-at is no longer the go-to move everyone has to spam.


Sorry what?

What does leap-at have to do with using a sword or not? I'm sorry but if you are leap ating someone in a 1v1 and you ***** it up your going to get destroyed.
User avatar
Binks
 
Posts: 1515
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:39 pm

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Jalpha » Thu May 29, 2014 3:58 am

Mereni wrote:It's also not ad hominim because he's questioning your methods of arguing your points, not saying they are invalid because of your personal traits or habits.

:roll:

neored9 wrote:Jalpha, you are guilty of the following crimes against intellect.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129326#p129326


Well I apologise for trying to be amusing. I explained my real reasons at least twice, they were ignored, or ****** counter-arguments were provided.

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129291#p129291


A common tribal tactic, as explained. If you can do it then so can I.

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129386#p129386


I am attempting to negotiate a situation in which the goals of both parties are met. Your argument is invalid.

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129285#p129285


This point was later backed up with personal experience and the fact that the tribe is untrustworthy in other matters. Why would people be somehow expected to believe the tribe can do one honourable thing...

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129287#p129287


Totally related to the argument at hand. In fact your rebuttal is tu-quoquo.

neored9 wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-emotion
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=9646&p=129289#p129289


There was a valid argument included, does it still count?

Your ****** astounds me. This leads into an endless circlejerk I'd rather not sully myself with (plus it's boring). You're clasping at straws here, straws so lame and futile that it's hardly worth me replying at all.
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am

Re: The Cost of a Weak Leader

Postby Jalpha » Thu May 29, 2014 4:02 am

Binks wrote:
Jalpha wrote:
Binks wrote:There is a very little difference between thrust and the punches.

Jalpha wrote:There is a lot of difference when leap-at is no longer the go-to move everyone has to spam.


Sorry what?

What does leap-at have to do with using a sword or not? I'm sorry but if you are leap ating someone in a 1v1 and you ***** it up your going to get destroyed.


Because leap-at is lame. PvP is lame. Leap-at until somebody ***** up or gets hit by it twice in succession. Try to get free thrusts. Just ***** off with that ****, it's overdone and it's boring.

Two...

Move...

PvP...
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests