Suffragium wrote:Ikpeip wrote:Suffragium, can you think of any records Realak might find interesting?
Kaios wrote:What I don't understand is how someone could possibly disagree with what happened in this scenario but thinks it's still fair to remove a player from the game and forum for months for not doing anything nearly as bad as abusing a bug, well, I feel bad for you and your perception of things.
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:That's because you are probably not privileged to the full disclosure of offenses from what I believe you are referring to. Had you seen the actions taken by this individual you may think differently.
Kaios wrote:So convince me? I'm never going to let it go otherwise. I don't mind being patient and throwing a jab in here and there because from my perspective it's as simple as this: Player makes lots of posts, everybody hates that player, you ban the player. Also if you're implying he made threats to do anything AFTER the hat thing started well that's your fault, is it not?
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:Unfortunately, I will have to earn your trust and respect otherwise, or find a way to live without it. As it is against policy to discuss the exact terms of bans on specific players.
Kaios wrote:JohnCarver wrote:Unfortunately, I will have to earn your trust and respect otherwise, or find a way to live without it. As it is against policy to discuss the exact terms of bans on specific players.
Cool story bro.
It's unfortunate the naivety of the readers doesn't allow them to see past the fact that I am not just arguing for Claeyt, but for when this happens again in the future, and I guarantee it will happen. With a bit of support you'd most certainly be forced to actually consider the things I have written.
Orcling wrote:Yknow, you could just ask Claeyt himself. Unless you don't trust what he says.
Why are you so bent on hearing the "why" from the devs?
Kaios wrote:
If you think Claeyt is intentionally guilty of any of this when it's the same person who was constantly advocating AGAINST racism then I guess that's why you're so confused about what I am asking.
Orcling wrote:So if you accidently murder someone, you're not guilty?
He posted several screenshots with the "N" word all over them. I would know, I was the one spamming it in Boston, already got punished for it aswell.(He can't say he didn't know about that rule, he had to agree to the new EULA to access the forums. If he didn't read that, it's entirely his own fault.)
And "Spamming" is true too, he admitted that in Skype himself, 100 pm's to the devs? If thats not spamming then I don't know what spamming is. Not to mention all his double if not triple posts, all having the same content. I dunno about defamation though, but he's ***** all over the everywhere, so I guess that could count as that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests