Darwoth wrote:no idea why this thread was even made since it has and will continue to consist of nothing but those who lost the first time around making suggestions for how they can lose less next time.
since it is such a difficult concept to grasp for the "everyone gets a trophy" generation let me explain what "winning" something means, it means you and a number of other people invested effort into an activity and that the individual that performed the best is recognized and rewarded for it while those who did not perform best are given a "better luck next time" pat on the back and invitation to try again.
it does not mean per goodman that there is a half dozen "winners" so him and his easy mode zerg do not have to argue over who wins or not.
it does not mean per kralith that a winner is "limited" to how much he can win or how many contests he can enter to make room for the lesser players to "win" something.
it does not mean per judaism that winning takes on a vague and laughable definition consisting of how many bodies can claim they have "influence"
it does not mean per insiqmeyer and numerous others that you get rewarded for losing.
it does not mean per tampion and numerous others that the contest is dumbed down so that winning is meaningless.
it does not mean the contest is redefined without pvp consumeables so the inept and lazy do not have to worry about them, it does not mean cannons are removed so that the people who seriously began the last expedition with over 60 active players (what a joke) are immune to being hit, it does not mean the map is shrunk so the zergs can locate everyone in a day nor does it mean that it is enlarged so the gimps can hide out the whole server.
it means that there are a small handful of people that did better at said contest and win something for doing so and that there are a whole lot more people that didn't, therefore lost and get nothing.
pretty much every single retard here has made a suggestion that would make the expedition suck more, not less.
insiqmeyer wrote:well if it is a one person win all kind of server then i suggest that we don't have anything like the ark, because that take too many people who aren't willing to work together to finish. The server should be all one winner take all just like popham 3rd circle witch minus the ark.
Darwoth wrote:it does not mean per goodman that there is a half dozen "winners" so him and his easy mode zerg do not have to argue over who wins or not.
Riolic wrote:The only reason raids still happen is because Goodman is a stubborn *******.
The rest are just vets pk'ing newbs
insiqmeyer wrote:
well if it is a one person win all kind of server then i suggest that we don't have anything like the ark, because that take too many people who aren't willing to work together to finish. The server should be all one winner take all just like popham 3rd circle witch minus the ark.
Goodman12 wrote:you are always right and everyone else are wrong.
Darwoth wrote:in reality there was very little wrong with popham, the issue is the pacifist playerbase not the server ruleset.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests