saltmummy wrote:You sad sad little man, my heart weeps for you. Better not go outside or your thin, tissue paper like skin might spontaneously rupture while your fragile sensibilities violently shatter spraying salt and urine all over the street.
Darwoth wrote:craigpick wrote:Darwoth wrote:
you saying that you did not mail me? you want a map I will give you one before I leave, you want to try take my town , I let you know where it is, I send you a map, yes you might think I bs about defences, but I never seen you take a town with decent defences, I only offering you opportunity to be the best;) you not want to take the offer of a salemtime? I understand if you not want to try take town that not left gates open;)
MarpTarpton wrote:Allowing the desturction of authority objects under a TBF doesn't undermine the concept as the defenses otherwise are far superior for bases properly built (with auth objects protected). The point of this was not to destroy peoples' towns. The point was to stop the rampant and otherwise protected spread of invincible auth objects the top towns easily and without repercussion propped up. That's pretty much it.
craigpick wrote:I do devs think have got this wrong, the thing that makes it worse is you trying to defend your position,
AmmaBoss wrote:This game have always been unfair and the dev make changes all the time that ***** over players.
Vexus wrote:So yeah. Nothing in Salem is safe, which is why this game rocks.
Procne wrote: Devs have again proven that they dont give a crap about untalented and lazy players.
MarpTarpton wrote:Final point, not much left to say.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests