by JohnCarver » Mon Jun 22, 2015 8:19 pm
For the record. I approve of players playing as terrorists, I think its interesting and as I pointed out in the conversation with the devs you have 50% of the FPS gaming world playing "Terrorists" in counterstrike for decades now. In fact, the group in question even cleared that they could indeed play as Islamic Terrorists. I thought it was a 'unique' idea to Salem even if off-color, I approved it then and I still approve/defend roleplaying any controversial group you wish now. What I don't approve of is:
Names I can't read.
Unoriginal role play or blatent impersonation where the minimum investment of a new name/identity with a backstroy is not even created.
I imagine there will be a large faction of players who will go on some freedom-fighting mission for the 'sandbox' element of pretending to be a real radical group. Or the idea that we should now ban "BuenosDias" because his name is not English too. I'll leave all that mess to Meow on how she wants to handle it. Mainly I was just posting here so y'all don't PM me as if I care.
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way