Page 3 of 16

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 2:50 pm
by Dallane
Justice

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 2:51 pm
by alloin
Darwoth wrote:i have placed a pox upon him that will cause him to KO more and more frequently as the bloodmoon nears until the cauldronmother can handle this.

Image

Image

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 2:57 pm
by Darwoth
on a serious note you ARE a douche for divulging information about the mechanic in that manner, the entire reason it is fun is because of the mystery behind it reserved for those who put the time and effort in.

if you wanted to write any sort of "guide" you should have gone the roleplayer route and written it in half truths and euphemisms to preserve that aspect instead of "hey man, do this ****!" your book on fire and ice spells was exceptionally annoying as most people took weeks to figure out the formula.


also i think the witchcraft forum should be reserved for those who have been dabbling in the mechanic for a while and are known to the community already so as to prevent some random newb buying a 4k doll and dropping a cut and past of everything he sees to his skype group.

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 3:20 pm
by alloin
Darwoth wrote:on a serious note you ARE a douche for divulging information about the mechanic in that manner, the entire reason it is fun is because of the mystery behind it reserved for those who put the time and effort in.

if you wanted to write any sort of "guide" you should have gone the roleplayer route and written it in half truths and euphemisms to preserve that aspect instead of "hey man, do this ****!" your book on fire and ice spells was exceptionally annoying as most people took weeks to figure out the formula.

Thanks for the advice, a little late though. I stopped writing any more books because I was under the impression you took over the job of spreading witch information.

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 3:31 pm
by Darwoth
simply because i warn people against the pitfalls of sky cardis hardly equates to making a poorly written spoiler about things you didn't know **** about before being clued in at witch meetings, that is what you did instead.

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 3:38 pm
by alloin
Darwoth wrote:simply because i warn people against the pitfalls of sky cardis hardly equates to making a poorly written spoiler about

I was more talking about you being my publisher you derp!

Darwoth wrote:things you didn't know **** about before being clued in at witch meetings, that is what you did instead.

That's a bit harsh to say about the person who taught you everything you know so far!

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 3:53 pm
by Potjeh
Information wants to be free! Keep fighting the good fight, Edward Snowden Alloin.

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 4:08 pm
by Darwoth
alloin wrote:
Darwoth wrote:simply because i warn people against the pitfalls of sky cardis hardly equates to making a poorly written spoiler about

I was more talking about you being my publisher you derp!



obviously you are mistaken, dallane and i have merely been cleaning up your mess by buying as many of your books as we can to keep them from falling into public view.

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 4:31 pm
by Argentis
Darwoth wrote:
alloin wrote:
Darwoth wrote:simply because i warn people against the pitfalls of sky cardis hardly equates to making a poorly written spoiler about

I was more talking about you being my publisher you derp!



obviously you are mistaken, dallane and i have merely been cleaning up your mess by buying as many of your books as we can to keep them from falling into public view.


Obviously flawed point here ¦]

Re: A New Subforum: Witchcraft

PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2015 4:35 pm
by Dallane
Argentis wrote:Obviously flawed point here ¦]


The more books we have the less there are to the public. DUH