Let's Get Ready to RUMBLE!

[Trenial]

Making alchemy tables smaller didn't fix a damn thing in regards to alchemy... just made whatever was accomplished smaller.

Better to have left it alone until you were truly willing to address the mechanism.

All you did was **** off the handful of die-hards who were willing to experiment with it... as is.

Alchemy works fine.

+1

[JohnCarver]

Making alchemy tables smaller didn't fix a damn thing in regards to alchemy... just made whatever was accomplished smaller.

Better to have left it alone until you were truly willing to address the mechanism.

All you did was **** off the handful of die-hards who were willing to experiment with it... as is.

WHAT?! Your telling me that the major problem with alchemy was not that tables had too many slots?! I thought for sure by reducing the slots I would have fixed everything. Perhaps 5 is still too many. Do you think 3 will solve everything?

[DarkNacht]

Making alchemy tables smaller didn't fix a damn thing in regards to alchemy... just made whatever was accomplished smaller.

Better to have left it alone until you were truly willing to address the mechanism.

All you did was **** off the handful of die-hards who were willing to experiment with it... as is.

WHAT?! Your telling me that the major problem with alchemy was not that tables had too many slots?! I thought for sure by reducing the slots I would have fixed everything. Perhaps 5 is still too many. Do you think 3 will solve everything?

1 slot per table is the ideal fix.

[JohnCarver]

1 slot per table is the ideal fix.

Random chance of 0 or 1 slot? That way it creates a market for people who want looks-only alchemy tables vs. those who prefer the function versions.

[DarkNacht]

WHAT?! Your telling me that the major problem with alchemy was not that tables had too many slots?! I thought for sure by reducing the slots I would have fixed everything. Perhaps 5 is still too many. Do you think 3 will solve everything?

1 slot per table is the ideal fix.

Random chance of 0 or 1 slot? That way it creates a market for people who want looks-only alchemy tables vs. those who prefer the function versions.

That would be great. The chance should be a percent equal to 1/10th your PerenP.

*First Player to Turn in a Hide Cape with THREE Indian Arrowheads in it = $50.00 worth of Store Items.

[Procne]

I'm not sure if I like this power creep. New skills require very high proficiencies, new inspiratrionals give a lot of proficiency points.

[JohnCarver]

I'm not sure if I like this power creep. New skills require very high proficiencies, new inspiratrionals give a lot of proficiency points.

If you recall the new skills we are adding are part of our new focus on professions. A casual player is meant to achieve a single profession in 1-2 months at best.

As for inspirationals, we added some for noobs and some we felt were middle of the road. Which ones do you feel are overpowered?

[Kandarim]

I like that there are now also new skills that take so much. And honestly, it's still very possible to get all of them in an acceptable time table - it just takes a bit of effort and perseverance (or flowers )

[Kandarim]

1 slot per table is the ideal fix.

Random chance of 0 or 1 slot? That way it creates a market for people who want looks-only alchemy tables vs. those who prefer the function versions.

does that mean we will get liftables trade?

[JohnCarver]

One of our primary focuses is to make sure there is more socialization. We feel that by having skills where only a handful of players or acquaintances might have them it will force players to get to know Tailors and Fine Leather Crafters. Even the steam distillation process we added was so that Fine Leathercrafters could make arrangements with Alchemists to share in the workload.

does that mean we will get liftables trade?

Now anytime soon. It is not high on our list.