
L33LEE wrote:Mereni wrote:L33LEE wrote:That says "released" to me.
I don't remember the thread, but it was stated by TotalyMoo quite some time ago that that Q1 2013 date is wrong and needs to be updated. We're still in beta, not released.
No Key required. Check
No limited access. Check
Cash shop in place and open for months to spend $$$. Check
This small list of items here shows this game is in COMMERCIAL OPEN RELEASE, with a beta tag attached like every other game do now days so they can totally break the system / ***** you over, and have a legal back fall.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Dallane wrote:Say what you will but its still beta. get over it.
darnokpl wrote:but redesigning basic game mechanic is very rare in beta it happens mostly in alpha and we are still before mining redesign (I hope) and before witchcrafting (basic game feature?).
ysbryd wrote:They ate... Jorb be praised, they ate...
jhnsmth wrote:darnokpl wrote:but redesigning basic game mechanic is very rare in beta it happens mostly in alpha and we are still before mining redesign (I hope) and before witchcrafting (basic game feature?).
You heard about World of Warcraft right?
Dallane wrote:Say what you will but its still beta. get over it.
alloin wrote:Dallane wrote:Say what you will but its still beta. get over it.
If it's really beta, I should be able to get my money back, right ? From a legal point of view ?![]()
![]()
![]()
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests