ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
alloin wrote:One stall per character ?
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:alloin wrote:One stall per character ?
In Salem, stall owns you.
JohnCarver wrote:No you cannot alt spam stall ownership.
RonPaulFTW wrote:JohnCarver wrote:No you cannot alt spam stall ownership.
How is this being enforced? I was wondering if you would do one stall per town to make keeping extra stalls also require keeping extra bells. So only one lucky citizen in each town could own one.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
JohnCarver wrote:Private, off boston, stalls are not going to be a thing. I don't necessarily see anything wrong with it other than I would want such a thing destroyable, which I think would then mean nobody would use it given the huge map sizes. Sure its nice if a town had one for their own members, but you can also leave things in a community shed etc. etc. if it is just for your own town.
JohnCarver wrote:Private, off boston, stalls are not going to be a thing. I don't necessarily see anything wrong with it other than I would want such a thing destroyable, which I think would then mean nobody would use it given the huge map sizes. Sure its nice if a town had one for their own members, but you can also leave things in a community shed etc. etc. if it is just for your own town.
loftar wrote:***** the treaty.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests