Procne wrote: Devs have again proven that they dont give a crap about untalented and lazy players.
Darwoth wrote:you know, cause they were obviously fascist white supremacist burrito nazis.
MaxPlanck wrote:Firstly, the person using follow command has their hands completely free to do whatever action it is to negate any retaliation from the person being followed if they were to turn around and attack. It is not easier for a person being followed to stop a follower.
Long range, the followed can sway the follower into obstacles better.
Mid range, the followed isn't worried about attacks from the follower but he can't stop the follower from following him easily.
Close range, the followed is ... probably not going to be followed using the follow command and the person pursuing is now trying to use leap at to stun from behind while moving with mouse clicks or keyboard.
Secondly, why should raiders get a free pass to follow each other around. Raiding is suppose to be an active thing, and if people want to use alts for various things and control them all on separate clients then that's THEIR FAULT and THEIR PROBLEM for trying to control multiple clients at once.
Bull **** on being against something for raiding, it has NOTHING to do with raiding and that is the most indirect statement of trying to wiggle the argument in that it actually does.
Instead of complaining how follow should stay because of raiding, how about you fix raiding to supposedly accommodate for the loss of the follow command which does not even directly affect raiding at all.
MaxPlanck wrote:I don't even use the follow command.
Icon wrote:This isn't Farmville with fighting, its Mortal Kombat with corn.
saltmummy wrote:You sad sad little man, my heart weeps for you. Better not go outside or your thin, tissue paper like skin might spontaneously rupture while your fragile sensibilities violently shatter spraying salt and urine all over the street.
Flame wrote:Actually i would read a single nice reason of why one should be able to auto follow an unknown chara that it's not in the party.
There are many ways to fight back the auto-follow, but it's not a reason to keep it. So Why should we keep it?
saltmummy wrote:You sad sad little man, my heart weeps for you. Better not go outside or your thin, tissue paper like skin might spontaneously rupture while your fragile sensibilities violently shatter spraying salt and urine all over the street.
Flame wrote:Actually i would read a single nice reason of why one should be able to auto follow an unknown chara that it's not in the party.
There are many ways to fight back the auto-follow, but it's not a reason to keep it. So Why should we keep it?
Darwoth wrote:you know, cause they were obviously fascist white supremacist burrito nazis.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests