1 active server insted of 3 semi activ.

Forum for suggesting changes to Salem.

Re: 1 active server insted of 3 semi activ.

Postby Dallane » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:34 pm

tweenprinc3ss wrote:I still think server transfers are awful idea. Even if it costs 5k. This is nothing to an established raider.


You rather play with only <100 people?
Please click this link for a better salem forum experience

TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
User avatar
Dallane
Moderator
 
Posts: 15195
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: 1 active server insted of 3 semi activ.

Postby CharlesM » Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:30 pm

It seems like there are fewer and fewer people playing each day, I feel like the transfers will open the world again and I won't feel so alone anymore.
It is by grace you have been saved, through faith - and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so that no one can boast. Ephesians 2:8-9/NIV

I am a proud Christian, post this if you are proud to be one too.
User avatar
CharlesM
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 1:40 pm

Re: 1 active server insted of 3 semi activ.

Postby Droj » Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:35 pm

I doubt transfers will change anything and most seem to have chars on every world by now.
***** the Treaty!
loftar wrote:I not like, you not get
User avatar
Droj
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:23 am
Location: England

Re: 1 active server insted of 3 semi activ.

Postby Mereni » Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:23 pm

darnokpl wrote:
tweenprinc3ss wrote:I still think server transfers are awful idea. Even if it costs 5k. This is nothing to an established raider.


That is great idea, largest factions will attack each other, so they will be busy and smaller camps will be safe for time of great wars :)


This is probably true. Who doesn't think the Tribe and the Russians would have it out if transfers were available?

It would be silly if the price was that steep though. No one would take it unless they were moving permanently. And if you have that much silver, you probably also have a lot of infrastructure you don't want to leave behind forever.

Edit: Bad Grammar. :(
User avatar
Mereni
 
Posts: 1839
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:26 am

Re: 1 active server insted of 3 semi activ.

Postby dageir » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:41 am

Over a month a go I made the assumption that transfering from one server to another would cost alot of silver, and I was scolded for making the assumption. I dont think the devs have made any statements on this yet.
Somebody once wrote, "Hell is the impossibility of reason." That's what this place feels like. Hell
User avatar
dageir
 
Posts: 1270
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:36 pm

Re: 1 active server insted of 3 semi activ.

Postby TeckXKnight » Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:08 am

It's meant to be viable for trade and the like in the future, so I doubt it'll cost an insane amount. Purely speculatory but I imagine different servers will have different costs to travel to. While the current main three may be the cheapest to come and go from, future servers that are themed and which are capable of growing special crops or that have unique foragables, but that lack the core goods that can be grown in other locations may be more expensive to travel to and away from.
User avatar
TeckXKnight
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:24 am

Previous

Return to Ideas & Innovations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests