1 active server insted of 3 semi activ.

[linustheman]

okej i got the point its good for testing =)

but it would be more fun to close 2 servers to "force" people to play in a more populated world,

but thanks then i know the reason.

[Dallane]

okej i got the point its good for testing =)

but it would be more fun to close 2 servers to "force" people to play in a more populated world,

but thanks then i know the reason.

The population wasn't that much different on one server

[linustheman]

okej i got the point its good for testing =)

but it would be more fun to close 2 servers to "force" people to play in a more populated world,

but thanks then i know the reason.

The population wasn't that much different on one server

so if you but hem all together, you mean that 2/3 of the players currently playing would stop playing?

[staxjax]

Over time, yes that is exactly what will happen. Then when there is a fresh world, population spike again.

[Dallane]

Over time, yes that is exactly what will happen. Then when there is a fresh world, population spike again.

yup

[CharlesM]

I think that server travel will act as a fresh world too, since people will be able to move around freely. I do think there should be more servers added though when the server transfer comes out so people can explore more.

[iamah]

problem is current mechanics makes old server very very dangerous... specially if you're not well established... good luck trying to start playing the game on an old server

[anfros]

All the servers are dangerous, its just that chief posts more than darwoth or the the russians do...

[tweenprinc3ss]

I still think server transfers are awful idea. Even if it costs 5k. This is nothing to an established raider.

[darnokpl]

I still think server transfers are awful idea. Even if it costs 5k. This is nothing to an established raider.

That is great idea, largest factions will attack each other, so they will be busy and smaller camps will be safe for time of great wars