Page 12 of 12

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2017 7:54 pm
by Taipion
As the files expired, here is again the PlayerAlertPlugin:

link to the project zip

link to the compiled jar

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:26 am
by ALTaZAR1
distiller plugin
is not correct work why not he fill all destiler only 1,3,5 other empty?

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 6:31 pm
by Kandarim
just run it a couple of times, it has this known problem which I don't have time to fix.
faster internet connections are less affected.

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 8:10 am
by Reviresco
Does anyone know whether Devs always register as a Player to the auto-alert/sentry bot plugin?

I'm considering making the move to cotton botting and I don't need JC or Marp showing up in my base as a chair or some ****.

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:57 am
by Kandarim
I know for a fact the devs can walk around without a visible mesh, which is what triggers the sentry plugin AFAIK. There are some quotes on "Salem Man" popping up out of nowhere to smite the unjust and unworthy.

Know that botting is not allowed anymore under the current dev rule; Salem Man would be justified in smiting you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edc9wyBCGCQ

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:51 pm
by Chrumps
Kandarim wrote:Know that botting is not allowed anymore under the current dev rule


@Devs: Can we have a stickied official announcement in this subforum defining what is allowed and what not ?
Clearly, there is a lot of confusion resulting from random forum quotes.

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:49 pm
by Taipion
Chrumps wrote:
Kandarim wrote:Know that botting is not allowed anymore under the current dev rule


@Devs: Can we have a stickied official announcement in this subforum defining what is allowed and what not ?
Clearly, there is a lot of confusion resulting from random forum quotes.


+1

Basically, if you have anything outside of what the plugins in this thread can do, you should ask the devs (well, Marp) if it is allowed.
I constantly hear people saying "As long as I am at the keybord (= not afk), I can do whatever I want with plugins" which is simply not the case.
On the contrary, there are a few rather simple and mostly convenient things that I did not do, simply because Marp/JC had a clear line there and decided against it.

As they seem to have rather clearly laid out views on such things,
it would be great to have it here for everyone to see.
This would likely also mean less work for Marp/JC doing case by case decisions, a win-win so to say. ^^

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:55 pm
by riolic
The problem with laying out guidelines in then some people will assuradly try to skate the rules. Then claiming well you said X wasn't allowed but I was only doing x!
It's likely much safer, albeit more work. To review uses case by case.

Re: Plug-in system for Latikai's client

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:51 am
by dragunov
Is there a minimalization plugin?