JohnCarver wrote:Darknacht nailed it. I dont' mind simple macros nor do I really care to police them if the player is there, sitting at his computer, still forced to initiate the macro and diligently perform the 'next step'. Complicated macros which automate entire processes while you are able to take an extended leave from your computer are where I personally draw the line.
That being said, Diablo could 'automate' their game so you click a monster once and your character keeps swinging on the mob over and over until it dies. Some people enjoy the zen of constant clicking. Others don't. Salem automates plenty of processes. It felt acceptable that the tedious task of prospecting be one that was click-happy.
Or not, if you find 'click and watch' more fun with your silly little macros.
bashnagdul wrote:you could not have the screen on focus and have tabbed out to the wiki...
trungdle wrote:I find it hard to define your line. Also, how can you keep in clear? People will base on this post and start using bots all over. With the new inventory system, one bot can give you tons of thing in one run. I just can't imagine how beneficial bot have become.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
bashnagdul wrote:
also known as, as long as he has no way of knowing if you are there or not, go smoke a cig
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.
Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
JohnCarver wrote:If I see your character moving/acting/playing/sending commands to the server, and do not get a quick and immediate confirmation in chat that you are there to communicate with me, I will take that as more than enough evidence that you are indeed smoking said cig and will ban you. It is hardly worth the risk to play the "but you don't know for sure" game. As I have no issue taking extreme disciplinary action WITHOUT 'knowing for sure'. Don't play with fire.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests